On 10.08.17 20:06, Bastian Blank wrote:
On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 05:42:44PM +, Fazzina, Angelo wrote:
I would think they both work for backwards compatibility and over time
"service postfix reload" will eventually be depreciated and no longer be a
valid command.
Well. "postfix reload" != "
On 11/08/17 05:20, Michael Fox wrote:
# cat /usr/lib/systemd/system/postfix.service
Hmm. My Ubuntu system has no such file.
On *buntu/deb machines it's...
/lib/systemd/system/postfix.service
dpkg -L postfix | grep service
> Well at least in Redhat, if you do systemctl reload postfix it just
> executes postfix reload internally. So it makes absolutely no
> difference.
>
> # cat /usr/lib/systemd/system/postfix.service
> [Unit]
> Description=Postfix Mail Transport Agent
> After=syslog.target network.target
> Conflicts
On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 05:42:44PM +, Fazzina, Angelo wrote:
> I would think they both work for backwards compatibility and over time
> "service postfix reload" will eventually be depreciated and no longer be a
> valid command.
Well. "postfix reload" != "service postfix reload".
Bastian
--
UITS, SSG, Server Systems
860-486-9075
-Original Message-
From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org]
On Behalf Of Julian Kippels
Sent: Thursday, August 10, 2017 1:35 PM
To: Michael Fox
Cc: postfix-users@postfix.org
Subject: Re: reloading postfix with s
Am Thu, 10 Aug 2017 10:19:25 -0700
schrieb "Michael Fox" :
> In v16.04 LTS, Ubuntu has switched to systemd.
>
> "postfix reload" still seems to work just fine.
> But I wonder if I should be using "systemctl reload postfix" instead.
>
> Which method is preferred on systems that use systemd?
> And
In v16.04 LTS, Ubuntu has switched to systemd.
"postfix reload" still seems to work just fine.
But I wonder if I should be using "systemctl reload postfix" instead.
Which method is preferred on systems that use systemd?
And if either method works, are there differences or reasons to prefer one
ov
