> No, there must be a "result" with the address, but postfix
> doesn't use that result. The file will look like:
>
> u...@example.com anything
> us...@example.com anything
> us...@example.com anything
>
> "anything" can be any text, such as an administrative comment.
That's what I thought. I
On 4/13/2010 10:01 PM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
Gary Smith put forth on 4/13/2010 7:07 PM:
Currently we are using mysql plugin for this and are switching over to static
files (or files generated on a schedule from the database). Anyway, looking at
the docs, it says that the entry need only been f
On Wed, April 14, 2010 5:01 am, Stan Hoeppner said:
> Gary Smith put forth on 4/13/2010 7:07 PM:
[...]
> > I know some time ago someone had mentioned for the hash lookup table
> > to work correctly it needed a key pair so I would think:
> >
> > j...@domain.tld j...@domain.tld
> >
> > Which is th
Gary Smith put forth on 4/13/2010 7:07 PM:
> Currently we are using mysql plugin for this and are switching over to static
> files (or files generated on a schedule from the database). Anyway, looking
> at the docs, it says that the entry need only been found in the file to be
> accepted, other
Currently we are using mysql plugin for this and are switching over to static
files (or files generated on a schedule from the database). Anyway, looking at
the docs, it says that the entry need only been found in the file to be
accepted, otherwise it will be rejected.
"Postfix needs to know
