Re: relay_recipient_maps and transport_maps

2013-03-20 Thread Noel Jones
On 3/20/2013 1:22 PM, Jon A. wrote: > Excellent, thanks very much for the advice Noel. In particular, > glad to hear wildcard entries won't open me up to accepting more > than desired! I didn't address wildcards... The wildcard syntax for transport_maps is different from that used in relay_recip

Re: relay_recipient_maps and transport_maps

2013-03-20 Thread Jon A.
Excellent, thanks very much for the advice Noel. In particular, glad to hear wildcard entries won't open me up to accepting more than desired! I'll split up transport and implement as you suggest ;) I am trying hard to avoid makefiles for my pretty static configurations, but I'll keep that in m

Re: relay_recipient_maps and transport_maps

2013-03-20 Thread Noel Jones
On 3/20/2013 1:05 PM, Jon A. wrote: > I've a number of "nobody" type aliases that I map in transport_maps > to the discard service. Our incoming MX boxes also reject mail > based on the valid userlist from our internal mail server. > > It would appear that the relay_recipient_maps is applied befo