Re: Relationship between relay and transport

Thanks very much for the reply. I think my root difficulty was understanding the hierarchy behind forwarding rules (in this specific case; between relay and transport related parameters / tables). Your examples put me onto http://www.postfix.org/transport.5.html which gave me a much better idea

Re: Relationship between relay and transport

Scott A. Wozny: > In the standard config on an email gateway in > (http://www.postfix.org/STANDARD_CONFIGURATION_README.html#firewall) the > proposed config has relay_domains set for example.com and > transport_maps set to a hash with example.com using > smtp:[inside-gateway.example.com]. This wou

Relationship between relay and transport

I’m trying to get a better understanding of the relationship between relay and transport. In the standard config on an email gateway in (http://www.postfix.org/STANDARD_CONFIGURATION_README.html#firewall) the proposed config has relay_domains set for example.com and transport_maps set to a

Re: relay and transport

thanks! On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 2:33 PM, Noel Jones wrote: > On 11/4/2009 12:51 AM, K bharathan wrote: > >> hi all >> i understand i can transport an email id in the transport map; so i can >> put: >> >> a...@example.com smtp:[192.168.0.1] >> example.com

Re: relay and transport

On 11/4/2009 12:51 AM, K bharathan wrote: hi all i understand i can transport an email id in the transport map; so i can put: a...@example.com smtp:[192.168.0.1] example.com smtp:[192.168.0.12] my doubt : with the above all mails to examp

relay and transport

hi all i understand i can transport an email id in the transport map; so i can put: a...@example.com smtp:[192.168.0.1] example.com smtp:[192.168.0.12] my doubt : with the above all mails to example.com will go to 192.168.0.12; will it include a...@example.com? or that particular mail w