On 10/04/2010 10:55 PM, mouss wrote:
Le 04/10/2010 21:10, Jeroen Geilman a écrit :
On 10/04/2010 08:31 PM, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
* Jeroen Geilman:
The real client IP ? That can't be trivially spoofed, and so would
actually BE your server.
I have seen clients who apparently connect to my M
Jeroen Geilman put forth on 10/4/2010 2:10 PM:
> The OP says in so many words that he sees connections WITH HIS IP: "who
> apparently connect to the MX *with the IP*"
>
> This does not happen.
Is this remotely plausible if he's behind a really funky NAT/masquerade?
I've seen some junk quality N
Le 04/10/2010 21:10, Jeroen Geilman a écrit :
On 10/04/2010 08:31 PM, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
* Jeroen Geilman:
The real client IP ? That can't be trivially spoofed, and so would
actually BE your server.
I have seen clients who apparently connect to my MX with the IP and
then send the IP aft
Le 04/10/2010 17:49, martin f krafft a écrit :
also sprach Noel Jones [2010.10.04.0507 +0200]:
Lots easier to just use
/^myhostname(\.mydomain)?$/ REJECT don't use my hostname
Thanks to everyone who responded. I am now going the suggested way.
However, it occurs to me that this is som
On 10/04/2010 08:31 PM, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
* Jeroen Geilman:
The real client IP ? That can't be trivially spoofed, and so would
actually BE your server.
I have seen clients who apparently connect to my MX with the IP and
then send the IP after HELO.
With YOUR IP ? T
i hijacked the server with the null sender
and the valid recipient
the mail go home
nb : hey madduck
Le lundi 04 octobre 2010 à 20:44 +0200, martin f krafft a écrit :
> also sprach Charles Marcus [2010.10.04.2029
> +0200]:
> > > Yes, with my IP.
> >
> > So your server is hacked?
>
> I am tal
Ralf Hildebrandt:
> > With YOUR IP ? That's highly unlikely, to the point of unbelievability.
>
> I've seen those as well; not from within my networks, but yes. I've
> seen them!
I see that all the time.
For me, blocking helo with with $inet_interfaces/$myhostname is
not sufficient, since Postfi
also sprach Charles Marcus [2010.10.04.2029 +0200]:
> > Yes, with my IP.
>
> So your server is hacked?
I am talking about the argument to HELO/EHLO. No, my server is not
hacked.
--
martin | http://madduck.net/ | http://two.sentenc.es/
"if english was good enough for jesus christ,
it's good
* Jeroen Geilman :
>
> Please don't send these redundant messages. It's a good indication of
> your general messaging skills.
>
>
> On 10/04/2010 07:56 PM, martin f krafft wrote:
> >also sprach Jeroen Geilman [2010.10.04.1822 +0200]:
> >>Where, exactly ?
> >The HELO greeting.
> >
> >>The real c
On 2010-10-04 2:15 PM, martin f krafft wrote:
>> With YOUR IP ? That's highly unlikely, to the point of unbelievability.
> Yes, with my IP.
So your server is hacked?
--
Best regards,
Charles
also sprach Jeroen Geilman [2010.10.04.2004 +0200]:
> >I have seen clients who apparently connect to my MX with the IP and
> >then send the IP after HELO.
>
> With YOUR IP ? That's highly unlikely, to the point of unbelievability.
Yes, with my IP.
--
martin | http://madduck.net/ | http://two.s
Please don't send these redundant messages. It's a good indication of
your general messaging skills.
On 10/04/2010 07:56 PM, martin f krafft wrote:
also sprach Jeroen Geilman [2010.10.04.1822 +0200]:
Where, exactly ?
The HELO greeting.
The real client IP ? That can't be tr
also sprach Jeroen Geilman [2010.10.04.1822 +0200]:
> Where, exactly ?
The HELO greeting.
> The real client IP ? That can't be trivially spoofed, and so would
> actually BE your server.
I have seen clients who apparently connect to my MX with the IP and
then send the IP after HELO.
> Personall
On 10/04/2010 05:49 PM, martin f krafft wrote:
also sprach Noel Jones [2010.10.04.0507 +0200]:
Lots easier to just use
/^myhostname(\.mydomain)?$/ REJECT don't use my hostname
Thanks to everyone who responded. I am now going the suggested way.
However, it occurs to me that th
On Mon, 4 Oct 2010 17:49:17 +0200
martin f krafft articulated:
> also sprach Noel Jones [2010.10.04.0507
> +0200]:
> > Lots easier to just use
> > /^myhostname(\.mydomain)?$/ REJECT don't use my hostname
>
> Thanks to everyone who responded. I am now going the suggested way.
>
> However,
also sprach Noel Jones [2010.10.04.0507 +0200]:
> Lots easier to just use
> /^myhostname(\.mydomain)?$/ REJECT don't use my hostname
Thanks to everyone who responded. I am now going the suggested way.
However, it occurs to me that this is something postfix could be
trivially doing itself,
16 matches
Mail list logo