On 6-Apr-2010, at 08:32, /dev/rob0 wrote:
>
> What "new type of spam" is this? I think there is no such thing. You
> need to show NON-VERBOSE logs of this "new spam" coming in.
My WAG is that his users are responding to the phishing emails and giving out
their usernames and password and then th
On Tue, Apr 06, 2010 at 08:11:02AM -0600, Josh Cason wrote:
> When I built the server after doing tons of research. (the old
> servers ran sendmail and I didn't have a hand in setting them up.)
> pop-before-smtp worked great for customers outside the network.
At best, pop-before-smtp is an ugly kl
On 4/6/2010 9:11 AM, Josh Cason wrote:
When I built the server after doing tons of research. (the old servers
ran sendmail and I didn't have a hand in setting them up.)
pop-before-smtp worked great for customers outside the network. If I
disabled pop-before-smtp they would not work. Just internal
Am 06.04.2010 16:11, schrieb Josh Cason:
> When I built the server after doing tons of research. (the old servers
> ran sendmail and I didn't have a hand in setting them up.)
> pop-before-smtp worked great for customers outside the network. If I
> disabled pop-before-smtp they would not work. Just
When I built the server after doing tons of research. (the old servers
ran sendmail and I didn't have a hand in setting them up.)
pop-before-smtp worked great for customers outside the network. If I
disabled pop-before-smtp they would not work. Just internal users. So
without any changes to
