Re: question about sender_dependent_default_transport_maps syntaxu

2013-08-28 Thread Fabio Sangiovanni
Wietse Venema porcupine.org> writes: > > Fabio Sangiovanni: > sender_dependent_default_transport_maps supports different syntax > than transport_maps. > > Both support the form "name:" and "name" (both mean the same thing). > That's where the similarity ends. > > In addition transport_maps s

Re: question about sender_dependent_default_transport_maps syntaxu

2013-08-28 Thread Wietse Venema
Fabio Sangiovanni: > Fabio Sangiovanni nweb.it> writes: > > > Is someone willing to clarify this a little? > > Sorry if I quote myself, but what about this? > Is it to be considered an error in the docs? > I'm referring to the possibility to specify a > null nexthop in sender_dependent_default_t

Re: question about sender_dependent_default_transport_maps syntaxu

2013-08-28 Thread Fabio Sangiovanni
Fabio Sangiovanni nweb.it> writes: > Is someone willing to clarify this a little? Sorry if I quote myself, but what about this? Is it to be considered an error in the docs? I'm referring to the possibility to specify a null nexthop in sender_dependent_default_transport_maps, while the documentat