RE: proper ordering of reject

2009-07-29 Thread Nick Sharp
: Nick Sharp > Subject: Re: proper ordering of reject > > > My_networks should really be considered trusted sources.. you are > saying > > permit_mynetworks (which includes your relay-IP list) so if you think > there is > > some potential they might send something dodgy, th

RE: proper ordering of reject

2009-07-29 Thread Nick Sharp
hotspot clients) I know I am suggesting another way, not really answering your question, but somehow what you are asking smells a bit like trouble.. Nick > -Original Message- > From: Andrew Long [mailto:furs...@gmail.com] > Sent: Wednesday, July 29, 2009 10:27 PM > To:

RE: proper ordering of reject

2009-07-29 Thread Nick Sharp
> -Original Message- > From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix- > us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of Andrew Long > Sent: Wednesday, July 29, 2009 9:55 PM > To: postfix-users > Subject: proper ordering of reject > > I am seeing from our logs that client

proper ordering of reject

2009-07-29 Thread Andrew Long
I am seeing from our logs that clients attempting to send mail through our system are being (correctly) rejected when listed on one of the two RBL's we use, but this is happening even for clients NOT listed in /etc/postfix/relay-ip. My concern is that we are using more overhead than needed to looku