Re: postscreen_access_list action code

2011-01-14 Thread John Fawcett
On 14/01/11 14:50, Wietse Venema wrote: > John Fawcett: > >> Up to now I have been using the same access file for: >> >> check_client_access in smtpd_mumble_restrictions >> and >> postscreen_whitelist_networks. >> >> since the client ips I had whitelisted for smtpd would also be >> whitelisted f

Re: postscreen_access_list action code

2011-01-14 Thread Wietse Venema
John Fawcett: > Up to now I have been using the same access file for: > > check_client_access in smtpd_mumble_restrictions > and > postscreen_whitelist_networks. > > since the client ips I had whitelisted for smtpd would also be > whitelisted for postscreen (in particular this whitelisting is use

postscreen_access_list action code

2011-01-14 Thread John Fawcett
Up to now I have been using the same access file for: check_client_access in smtpd_mumble_restrictions and postscreen_whitelist_networks. since the client ips I had whitelisted for smtpd would also be whitelisted for postscreen (in particular this whitelisting is used to avoid DNSBL checks on spe