Andrew Bourgeois:
> > As documented, "postqueue -i" pushes one message to the incoming
> > queue, while "postqueue -f" triggers delivery of all deferred mail.
>
> It's not clearly stated in the man pages of postqueue and flush. But since
-i queue_id
Schedule immediate delivery of deferred
On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 06:11:20PM +0100, Andrew Bourgeois wrote:
> > > My question is: why is that?
> >
> > Because of the difference: one message, instead of all.
>
> So it's done because of performance reasons?
No, for protocol reasons. The external queue manager protocol
by which pickup, cle
On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 3:37 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Andrew Bourgeois:
> > Hello
> >
> > stress tests indicate that Postfix 2.8.8 behaves differently when using
> > "postqueue -i" compared to "postqueue -f" when it comes to handling
> > deferred e-mail.
>
> As documented, "postqueue -i" pushes
Andrew Bourgeois:
> Hello
>
> stress tests indicate that Postfix 2.8.8 behaves differently when using
> "postqueue -i" compared to "postqueue -f" when it comes to handling
> deferred e-mail.
As documented, "postqueue -i" pushes one message to the incoming
queue, while "postqueue -f" triggers deli
Hello
stress tests indicate that Postfix 2.8.8 behaves differently when using
"postqueue -i" compared to "postqueue -f" when it comes to handling
deferred e-mail.
When using "postqueue -i" in a loop, deferred e-mail goes through the
incoming queue before going through the active queue.
When usin
