LuKreme a écrit :
> On 27-Mar-2009, at 09:57, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
>> * LuKreme :
>>> On 26-Mar-2009, at 18:06, Sahil Tandon wrote:
On Thu, 26 Mar 2009, LuKreme wrote:
> I have in my postffix helo checks, perhaps a bad idea,
>
> [some checks up here that reject]
> /^pos
On Mar 27, 2009, at 12:18 PM, LuKreme wrote:
On 27-Mar-2009, at 09:57, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
* LuKreme :
On 26-Mar-2009, at 18:06, Sahil Tandon wrote:
On Thu, 26 Mar 2009, LuKreme wrote:
I have in my postffix helo checks, perhaps a bad idea,
[some checks up here that reject]
/^postmaste
On 27-Mar-2009, at 09:57, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
* LuKreme :
On 26-Mar-2009, at 18:06, Sahil Tandon wrote:
On Thu, 26 Mar 2009, LuKreme wrote:
I have in my postffix helo checks, perhaps a bad idea,
[some checks up here that reject]
/^postmaster\@/ OK
/^abuse\@/ OK
Why do these email
* LuKreme :
> On 26-Mar-2009, at 18:06, Sahil Tandon wrote:
>> On Thu, 26 Mar 2009, LuKreme wrote:
>>
>>> I have in my postffix helo checks, perhaps a bad idea,
>>>
>>> [some checks up here that reject]
>>> /^postmaster\@/ OK
>>> /^abuse\@/ OK
>>
>> Why do these email address patterns appear i
On 26-Mar-2009, at 18:06, Sahil Tandon wrote:
On Thu, 26 Mar 2009, LuKreme wrote:
I have in my postffix helo checks, perhaps a bad idea,
[some checks up here that reject]
/^postmaster\@/ OK
/^abuse\@/ OK
Why do these email address patterns appear in a HELO access(5) map?
Because 9 yea
On Thu, 26 Mar 2009, LuKreme wrote:
> I have in my postffix helo checks, perhaps a bad idea,
>
> [some checks up here that reject]
> /^postmaster\@/ OK
> /^abuse\@/ OK
Why do these email address patterns appear in a HELO access(5) map?
> At the time I set this up it was pretty important tha
LuKreme a écrit :
> I have in my postffix helo checks, perhaps a bad idea,
>
> [some checks up here that reject]
> /^postmaster\@/ OK
> /^abuse\@/ OK
>
> At the time I set this up it was pretty important that postmaster mail
> got through, but looking over the last 12 months of mail, I've re
On 26-Mar-2009, at 14:10, LuKreme wrote:
Once the message gets OKed by helo_checks.pcre it does not get
checked by the reject_rbl_client.
Ah.. OK, this is not right. It is just that the IP was not in the RBL
when that message came through.
So, the original question still stands:
is there
On 26-Mar-2009, at 13:36, Brian Evans - Postfix List wrote:
LuKreme wrote:
On 26-Mar-2009, at 11:53, Peter Blair wrote:
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 12:55 PM, LuKreme wrote:
Obviously I can't disable the account as it is required, but is
there
something that I can do to stop the connections for
LuKreme wrote:
> On 26-Mar-2009, at 11:53, Peter Blair wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 12:55 PM, LuKreme wrote:
>>
>>> Obviously I can't disable the account as it is required, but is there
>>> something that I can do to stop the connections for messages like this:
>>>
>>> Return-Path:
>>> X-Ori
On 26-Mar-2009, at 11:53, Peter Blair wrote:
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 12:55 PM, LuKreme wrote:
Obviously I can't disable the account as it is required, but is there
something that I can do to stop the connections for messages like
this:
Return-Path:
X-Original-To: postmas...@covisp.net
Del
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 12:55 PM, LuKreme wrote:
> Obviously I can't disable the account as it is required, but is there
> something that I can do to stop the connections for messages like this:
>
> Return-Path:
> X-Original-To: postmas...@covisp.net
> Delivered-To: postmas...@covisp.net
> Recei
I have in my postffix helo checks, perhaps a bad idea,
[some checks up here that reject]
/^postmaster\@/ OK
/^abuse\@/ OK
At the time I set this up it was pretty important that postmaster mail
got through, but looking over the last 12 months of mail, I've
received exactly two legitimate
13 matches
Mail list logo
