richard lucassen:
> Hello list,
>
> When e.g. I have an access file with:
>
> domain.tld reject
> baduser@ reject
>
> Postfix will reject "u...@domain.tld" and "baduser@anydomain.anytld".
>
> When I want to test these db's using "postmap -q", postmap only tests
> the "real" entries in the
On Thu, 16 Nov 2017 20:49:23 -0600
/dev/rob0 wrote:
> You did not mention how your access file was being used. Apparently
> it's being used for email address lookups, so perhaps
> check_sender_access or check_recipient_access. Any supercharged
> postmap tool would have to know this also. Th
On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 10:20:09PM +0100, richard lucassen wrote:
> When e.g. I have an access file with:
>
> domain.tld reject
> baduser@ reject
>
> Postfix will reject "u...@domain.tld" and
> "baduser@anydomain.anytld".
>
> When I want to test these db's using "postmap -q", postmap only
Hello list,
When e.g. I have an access file with:
domain.tld reject
baduser@ reject
Postfix will reject "u...@domain.tld" and "baduser@anydomain.anytld".
When I want to test these db's using "postmap -q", postmap only tests
the "real" entries in the database. Is there a *simple CLI* way t
On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 03:44:49PM -0700, LuKreme wrote:
> Excellent. If you build with cdb there's no reason to build
> against BerkeleyDB, right?
You'll still need something else for caches, that's Berkeley DB or LMDB.
--
Viktor.
* LuKreme :
>
> On 27 Feb 2014, at 14:50 , Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
>
> > For read-only indexed files, that are not updated incrementaly,
> > the best database type is "cdb". It is fastest, requires least
> > per-process private memory, has the most stable on-disk format and
> > has proved reliab
On 27 Feb 2014, at 14:50 , Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
> For read-only indexed files, that are not updated incrementaly,
> the best database type is "cdb". It is fastest, requires least
> per-process private memory, has the most stable on-disk format and
> has proved reliable over many years.
Excel
On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 02:35:52PM -0700, LuKreme wrote:
> What is the best choice for the database to compile postfix
> against for use of hash/postmap files?
For read-only indexed files, that are not updated incrementaly,
the best database type is "cdb". It is fastest, requires least
per-proce
What is the best choice for the database to compile postfix against for use of
hash/postmap files?
is LMDB (lmdb:) in postfix 2.11 going to be the best choice when I move to 2.11?
Currently the only hash: type files I have are alias_maps, alias_database,
check_client_acces.
There's also trans
