On 06/01/17 20:28, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Instead of logging a warning when it receives an unexpected protocol
> message?
> Postfix could require that the 'first' message between Postfix
> programs(*) contains the protocol name (enqueue, bounce, deliver,
> verify, ...). That way, the warning messag
On 1/6/2017 1:28 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
>> Maybe have discard: exit with a fatal error when it's called as
>> bounce?
>
> Instead of logging a warning when it receives an unexpected
> protocol message?
Yes, that would solve this misuse. We can't prevent all unwise
uses, but maybe we can raise
Noel Jones:
> On 1/5/2017 6:47 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> > Postfix User:
> >> On Thu, 5 Jan 2017 17:11:15 -0500, Viktor Dukhovni stated:
> >>
> >>> Perhaps we should add comments above internal core service entries in
> >>> master.cf: "DO NOT REMOVE, DO NOT MODIFY, ..."
> >>
> >> Personally, I bel
On Fri, Jan 06, 2017 at 12:29:58PM -0600, Noel Jones wrote:
> On 1/5/2017 6:47 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> > Postfix User:
> >> On Thu, 5 Jan 2017 17:11:15 -0500, Viktor Dukhovni stated:
> >>
> >>> Perhaps we should add comments above internal core service entries in
> >>> master.cf: "DO NOT REMOVE,
On 1/5/2017 6:47 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Postfix User:
>> On Thu, 5 Jan 2017 17:11:15 -0500, Viktor Dukhovni stated:
>>
>>> Perhaps we should add comments above internal core service entries in
>>> master.cf: "DO NOT REMOVE, DO NOT MODIFY, ..."
>>
>> Personally, I believe it would be a waste of
Postfix User:
> On Thu, 5 Jan 2017 17:11:15 -0500, Viktor Dukhovni stated:
>
> >Perhaps we should add comments above internal core service entries in
> >master.cf: "DO NOT REMOVE, DO NOT MODIFY, ..."
>
> Personally, I believe it would be a waste of time Victor. Like the
> saying, "Nothing is fool
On Thu, 5 Jan 2017 17:11:15 -0500, Viktor Dukhovni stated:
>Perhaps we should add comments above internal core service entries in
>master.cf: "DO NOT REMOVE, DO NOT MODIFY, ..."
Personally, I believe it would be a waste of time Victor. Like the
saying, "Nothing is foolproof to the sufficiently mo
> On Jan 5, 2017, at 4:44 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
>
> No, he followed Robert Chalmer's advice to substitute the discard service
> in place of the bounce service. Terrible idea.
Wow, more than "terrible": profoundly misguided. The bounce service is not
a delivery agent and should not be modifi
Viktor Dukhovni:
>
> > On Jan 5, 2017, at 10:29 AM, linux-service wrote:
> >
> > Jan 5 15:44:40 mail postfix/discard[21428]: warning: unexpected attribute
> > nrequest from bounce socket (expecting: flags)
>
> It looks like your Postfix installation is broken (contains binaries from
> multipl
On 2017-01-05 11:53 AM, linux-service wrote:
I did changed joomla from phpmail to sendmail and the problem is over,
even with body_checks enabled
Just goes to show - if you have a problem and you think that PHP is the
solution then you have two problems. :-)
--
D'Arcy J.M. Cain
System Admin
> On Jan 5, 2017, at 10:29 AM, linux-service wrote:
>
> Jan 5 15:44:40 mail postfix/discard[21428]: warning: unexpected attribute
> nrequest from bounce socket (expecting: flags)
> Jan 5 15:44:40 mail postfix/discard[21428]: warning: deliver_request_get:
> error receiving common attributes
I did changed joomla from phpmail to sendmail and the problem is over,
even with body_checks enabled
guy
Op 05-01-17 om 17:48 schreef Viktor Dukhovni:
On Jan 5, 2017, at 10:29 AM, linux-service wrote:
Jan 5 15:44:40 mail postfix/discard[21428]: warning: unexpected attribute
nrequest from
> On Jan 5, 2017, at 10:29 AM, linux-service wrote:
>
> Jan 5 15:44:40 mail postfix/discard[21428]: warning: unexpected attribute
> nrequest from bounce socket (expecting: flags)
It looks like your Postfix installation is broken (contains binaries from
multiple versions of Postfix). Stop pos
body of mail:
http://www.ubuntushop.be/mailbody.txt
guy
Op 05-01-17 om 16:39 schreef chaouche yacine:
Are you sending the PDF via a common MUA or via a program/script ?
On Thursday, January 5, 2017 4:30 PM, linux-service
wrote:
I want to receive a mail with pdf attached but got errors:
From a different site…
How do I configure Postfix to never send NDR responses? For example, if someone
tries to send an email to a user that doesn't exist, I don't want my server to
respond and let them know that it doesn't exist. I just simply don't want it to
respond.
It is strongly suggeste
Yes, from joomla with phpmail
I have disabled body_checks in postfix and than it was ok.
guy
Op 05-01-17 om 16:39 schreef chaouche yacine:
Are you sending the PDF via a common MUA or via a program/script ?
On Thursday, January 5, 2017 4:30 PM, linux-service
wrote:
I want to receive a
Are you sending the PDF via a common MUA or via a program/script ?
On Thursday, January 5, 2017 4:30 PM, linux-service
wrote:
I want to receive a mail with pdf attached but got errors:
Jan 5 15:44:40 mail postfix/cleanup[21419]: 3AF94CC3CDC:
message-id=<809c0b3357a556a826cd508693b0f.
I want to receive a mail with pdf attached but got errors:
Jan 5 15:44:40 mail postfix/cleanup[21419]: 3AF94CC3CDC:
message-id=<809c0b3357a556a826cd508693b0f...@www.ubuntushop.be>
Jan 5 15:44:40 mail postfix/cleanup[21419]: 3AF94CC3CDC: reject: body
lgwSkgRBEQhIAhx6yJgLL8xxhz71jAvOOv2ZV998L7f
18 matches
Mail list logo
