> On Mar 6, 2019, at 8:40 AM, Marek Kozlowski
> wrote:
>
> I'm using dovecot for IMAP/POP. I've read that since dovecot 2.0 I may use
> dovecot
> as an LMTP and implement desired solution by adding sieve/pigeon classifier to
> dovecot LMTP. It perfectly(?) integrates with postfix.
The Dovec
:-)
I know the basic postfix operational scheme:
http://www.postfix.org/OVERVIEW.html
I have a generic spamassassin instance that marks messages recognized as
spam, `/etc/postfix/master.cf' :
smtp inet n - n - - smtpd
-o content_filter=spamassassin
spa
On 02/26/2017 06:40 PM, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
[...]
Thank you (and Wietse) very much for clarification!
Best regars,
Marek
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
> On Feb 26, 2017, at 12:26 PM, Marek Kozlowski
> wrote:
>
>>> smtp inet n - n - - smtpd
>>> -o content_filter=spamassassin
>>> -o receive_override_options=no_address_mappings
>>
>> Mail that comes in via SMTP is (initially) force-routed to the
>> above spec
On 02/26/2017 06:18 PM, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
>
>> On Feb 26, 2017, at 11:37 AM, Marek Kozlowski
>> wrote:
>>
>> Let's assume that services defined in `master.cf' are as follows:
>> ---
>> smtp inet n - n
> On Feb 26, 2017, at 11:37 AM, Marek Kozlowski
> wrote:
>
> Let's assume that services defined in `master.cf' are as follows:
> ---
> smtp inet n - n - - smtpd
> -o content_filter=spamassas
:-)
I've had some problems with using unionmaps. Finally it showed that they
were caused by improper configuration of services in the `master.cf'. So
I have decided to improve my knowledge by studying how postfix services
really work and cooperate more thoroughly. I've started with:
http://www.po
On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 09:36:00AM -0500, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> I thought there might be people here that would find this of interest:
>
> http://liquidat.wordpress.com/2014/02/25/postfix-architecture-overview/
Thanks. A quick correction. showq(8) does not IIRC communicate
with
I thought there might be people here that would find this of interest:
http://liquidat.wordpress.com/2014/02/25/postfix-architecture-overview/
Scott K
Hi!
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 6:47 AM, spambox wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, 10 May 2010 01:00:29 -0430
> Jose Ildefonso Camargo Tolosa wrote:
>
>> Hi!
>>
>> Yes, I know, this is kinda off-topic, but looks interesting.
>
> Thank you for your interest!
>
>> > |-|
>> > | postfix1 |
On Mon, 10 May 2010 01:00:29 -0430
Jose Ildefonso Camargo Tolosa wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Yes, I know, this is kinda off-topic, but looks interesting.
Thank you for your interest!
> > |-|
> > | postfix1 | very big storage
> > | LDAP1 |-|
Hi!
Yes, I know, this is kinda off-topic, but looks interesting.
On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 8:08 AM, spambox wrote:
> Hello everyone.
>
> This is my first question here so please forgive me if i'm out of topic or
> something...
>
>
> I'm building up this architecture with postfix + ldap + Courier I
spambox a écrit :
> Hello everyone.
>
> This is my first question here so please forgive me if i'm out of topic or
> something...
>
>
> I'm building up this architecture with postfix + ldap + Courier IMAP
> (i hope the below ascii art is displaying correctly :)
>
>
>
> |-|
> |
Hello everyone.
This is my first question here so please forgive me if i'm out of topic or
something...
I'm building up this architecture with postfix + ldap + Courier IMAP
(i hope the below ascii art is displaying correctly :)
|-|
| postfix1 | very big storage
|
> Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 11:41:28 -0600
> From: njo...@megan.vbhcs.org
> To: postfix-users@postfix.org
> Subject: Re: postfix architecture
>
> On 12/21/2009 10:18 AM, Houssam El Hallak wrote:
> >
> >
> > > Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 09:45:56 -0600
> &
On 12/21/2009 10:18 AM, Houssam El Hallak wrote:
> Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 09:45:56 -0600
> From: njo...@megan.vbhcs.org
> To: postfix-users@postfix.org
> Subject: Re: postfix architecture
>
> On 12/21/2009 9:14 AM, Houssam El Hallak wrote:
> >
> > Hel
> Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 09:45:56 -0600
> From: njo...@megan.vbhcs.org
> To: postfix-users@postfix.org
> Subject: Re: postfix architecture
>
> On 12/21/2009 9:14 AM, Houssam El Hallak wrote:
> >
> > Hello
> >
> > thak you for your answer
> >
On 12/21/2009 9:14 AM, Houssam El Hallak wrote:
Hello
thak you for your answer
I have underston for question 1
now back to question 2 about the local detection of all my inbound mails
yest it is in my local network but not decalred in $mynetworks , so is
it still normal behaviour
"Passed Cl
CC: postfix-users@postfix.org
From: mart...@youngguns.nl
Subject: Re: postfix architecture
Date: Sun, 20 Dec 2009 21:54:38 +0100
To: linuxfra...@hotmail.com
On Dec 20, 2009, at 9:37 PM, Houssam El Hallak wrote:
Hello
this is my first post here , so If any mistake with this post
On Dec 20, 2009, at 9:37 PM, Houssam El Hallak wrote:
>
>
>
> Hello
> this is my first post here , so If any mistake with this post please let me
> know .
>
> question 1 : is this a good postfix architecture ??
>
> I have 2 postfix Servers :
> DMZ_p
Hello
this is my first post here , so If any mistake with this post please let me
know .
question 1 : is this a good postfix architecture ??
I have 2 postfix Servers :
DMZ_postfix which has basic protection (192.168.0.1). and forward emails to
LAN_postfixLAN_postfix which has
21 matches
Mail list logo
