On 1/22/2009, ram (r...@netcore.co.in) wrote:
> I have a got a stupid problem. We have some customers saying they
> can't and don't want to reconfigure their mail servers even if
> Planet-X hits Earth and that would help to avoid it :) And their MTAs
> always responds with:
If they are that brain
Gábor Lénárt wrote:
On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 12:38:28PM -0600, Noel Jones wrote:
[...]
Also sounds as if you don't have a valid recipient list for these
customers. Not OK. Your queue is likely filled with lots of
undeliverable mail to unknown recipients, and undeliverable bounces to
bogus sen
ram wrote:
On Wed, 2009-01-21 at 18:36 +0100, Gábor Lénárt wrote:
Hei,
I have a got a stupid problem. We have some customers saying they can't and
don't want to reconfigure their mail servers even if Planet-X hits Earth and
that would help to avoid it :) And their MTAs always responds with:
45
On Wed, 2009-01-21 at 18:36 +0100, Gábor Lénárt wrote:
> Hei,
>
> I have a got a stupid problem. We have some customers saying they can't and
> don't want to reconfigure their mail servers even if Planet-X hits Earth and
> that would help to avoid it :) And their MTAs always responds with:
>
> 45
On Jan 21, 2009, at 11:36 AM, Gábor Lénárt wrote:
450 : Recipient address rejected: User
unknown in local recipient table (in reply to RCPT TO command))
if there is an invalid, non existing mail address there. However
they argues that they would like us not to try to deliver mails
again a
On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 12:38:28PM -0600, Noel Jones wrote:
[...]
> Also sounds as if you don't have a valid recipient list for these
> customers. Not OK. Your queue is likely filled with lots of
> undeliverable mail to unknown recipients, and undeliverable bounces to
> bogus senders, plus you
On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 01:49:35PM -0500, Victor Duchovni wrote:
[...]
> Sorry, without an enhanced status code after the 450, you really don't
> have anything to work with. The most plausible feature in this space is
> "selective soft_bounce" where some, but not all, enhanced status codes
> are do
Noel Jones:
> Also sounds as if you don't have a valid recipient list for
> these customers. Not OK. Your queue is likely filled with
> lots of undeliverable mail to unknown recipients, and
> undeliverable bounces to bogus senders, plus you're sending
> out backscatter to innocent parties. T
On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 06:36:31PM +0100, G?bor L?n?rt wrote:
> I have a got a stupid problem. We have some customers saying they can't and
> don't want to reconfigure their mail servers even if Planet-X hits Earth and
> that would help to avoid it :) And their MTAs always responds with:
>
> 450
Gábor Lénárt wrote:
Hei,
I have a got a stupid problem. We have some customers saying they can't and
don't want to reconfigure their mail servers even if Planet-X hits Earth and
that would help to avoid it :) And their MTAs always responds with:
450 : Recipient address rejected: User
unknown
Hei,
I have a got a stupid problem. We have some customers saying they can't and
don't want to reconfigure their mail servers even if Planet-X hits Earth and
that would help to avoid it :) And their MTAs always responds with:
450 : Recipient address rejected: User
unknown in local recipient ta
11 matches
Mail list logo