Re: my question for nested_header_checks

2008-10-31 Thread isobetti
Hi, Noel and Victor Thank you very much for your precious informations. I got it. Maybe I just have to use body_checks against broken format.. regards, isobetti --- postfix-users@postfix.org --- >On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 10:12:08AM -0500, Noel Jones wrote: > >> Anything else is just body text,

Re: my question for nested_header_checks

2008-10-31 Thread Victor Duchovni
On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 10:12:08AM -0500, Noel Jones wrote: > Anything else is just body text, even if it looks like a header. > > Standard bounces come with the original headers as an attached > message; they can be examined by nested_header_checks. Some > bounces arrive with the original heade

Re: my question for nested_header_checks

2008-10-31 Thread Noel Jones
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > But some mails which should be caught by nested_header_checks or > mime_header_checks can't help but go through my filter for some reason. > And I don't know why.. > > However, I found a difference between mails which my filter could catch and > mails which my filter c

my question for nested_header_checks

2008-10-30 Thread isobetti
Hi folks, Sorry in advance if it's well known matter. I have some troubles about nested_header_checks in main.cf of postfix. [environment] - OS Solaris10sparc - postfix mail_version = 2.4.6 % postconf header_checks header_checks = regexp:/etc/postfix/header_checks % postconf nested_header_che