--On Friday, January 16, 2009 10:08 AM -0800 Quanah Gibson-Mount
wrote:
We use postfix to accept and deliver the email, and have the email run
through the milter and amavisd for delivery.
eh, through the milter and amavisd /before/ delivery. :P
We were able to track this down to a bug in t
--On Friday, January 16, 2009 10:03 AM -0800 Quanah Gibson-Mount
wrote:
--On Friday, January 16, 2009 7:01 AM -0500 Wietse Venema
wrote:
Quanah Gibson-Mount:
We have a milter that examines emails and adds headers if it believes
they are spam. However, it looks like 33% of the time, the h
--On Friday, January 16, 2009 7:01 AM -0500 Wietse Venema
wrote:
Quanah Gibson-Mount:
We have a milter that examines emails and adds headers if it believes
they are spam. However, it looks like 33% of the time, the headers
that we've added to the email are stripped out by postfix before
de
Quanah Gibson-Mount:
> We have a milter that examines emails and adds headers if it believes they
> are spam. However, it looks like 33% of the time, the headers that we've
> added to the email are stripped out by postfix before delivery, which ends
> up causing a lot of spam to get delivered.
We have a milter that examines emails and adds headers if it believes they
are spam. However, it looks like 33% of the time, the headers that we've
added to the email are stripped out by postfix before delivery, which ends
up causing a lot of spam to get delivered. We've snooped the connection
