On 2/6/2012 2:17 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
Nick Bright:
The patch should not allow message size limit> mailbox size limit.
Unpatched Postfix forbids this, but they removed that check.
I should have written: virtual_mailbox_limit.
virtual_mailbox_limit isn't defined; but I am using a
virtual
On 2/6/2012 2:19 AM, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
Also, the content filter doesn't announce a SIZE:
You forgot to issue the EHLO command - only after this command the
filter might announce the SIZE extension.
Or rather LHLO (since mppscan seems to speak lmtp):
Oops!
$ telnet localhost 10025
Try
Nick Bright:
> > The patch should not allow message size limit> mailbox size limit.
> > Unpatched Postfix forbids this, but they removed that check.
> >
>
> In this case, mailbox_size_limit shouldn't come in to play. If I'm
> reading http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#mailbox_size_limit
> c
On 2/6/2012 6:01 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
Tomas Macek:
You probably have a bug in the VDA patch that breaks
when the message size limit exceeds the mailbox size
limit. Their code does not handle that correctly.
That seems highly plausible.
What should be a proper behaviour in this case?
T
Tomas Macek:
> > Postfix logs all attempts to deliver mail, whether
> > or not successful.
> >
> > Please do not turn on debug logging, it will just make
> > the problem harder to diagnose.
> >
> > You probably have a bug in the VDA patch that breaks
> > when the message size limit exceeds the mail
> There are no log entries other than normal entries reflecting that
> the messages have been accepted for delivery, though per another
> posters' recommendation; I will enable debug logging and give it
> another look.
Please don't.
> Also, the content filter doesn't announce a SIZE:
>
> $ telne
On Sun, 5 Feb 2012, Wietse Venema wrote:
Nick Bright:
On 2/4/2012 12:20 PM, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
* Nick Bright:
Upon restarting postfix with message_size_limit in place it simply
wouldn't deliver any mail. It accepts the mail in to SMTP just fine,
but it never gets delivered.
Logs?
T
Nick Bright:
> On 2/4/2012 12:20 PM, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> > * Nick Bright:
> >
> >> Upon restarting postfix with message_size_limit in place it simply
> >> wouldn't deliver any mail. It accepts the mail in to SMTP just fine,
> >> but it never gets delivered.
> >
> > Logs?
> >
>
> There are no
On 2/4/2012 12:20 PM, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
* Nick Bright:
Upon restarting postfix with message_size_limit in place it simply
wouldn't deliver any mail. It accepts the mail in to SMTP just fine,
but it never gets delivered.
Logs?
There are no log entries other than normal entries reflect
Nick Bright:
> Greetings,
>
> I'm having some trouble with my Postfix configuration, the default limit
> of 10MB for messages is causing many of my end users to complain that
> the limit is far too small. To increase this value per the documentation
> at http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#m
* Nick Bright :
> Upon restarting postfix with message_size_limit in place it simply
> wouldn't deliver any mail. It accepts the mail in to SMTP just fine,
> but it never gets delivered.
Logs?
> No mail appears to be lost, and no errors appear in the maillog while
> message_size_limit is in effe
Greetings,
I'm having some trouble with my Postfix configuration, the default limit
of 10MB for messages is causing many of my end users to complain that
the limit is far too small. To increase this value per the documentation
at http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#message_size_limit I adde
12 matches
Mail list logo
