Re: mail transport unavailable for email in the queue

On 7/28/2014 3:39 AM, Marco Fioretti wrote: > in addition to what I just wrote, I realized only in this instant > that an email from one of two IPs in mynetworks: > > mynetworks = 127.0.0.0/8 , ip.1, ip.2 (THESE ARE > FIXED IPS OF TWO > > > is rejected with this message in t

Re: mail transport unavailable for email in the queue

> And, you configured the dksign service as a content filter? In that case "postsuper -r ALL" (or postsuper -r queue_id). Yes and no. the old (centos 4 +postfix 2.whatever it was) **had** dksign configured in that way. Then I got this brand new cento6 server with postfix 2.6.6. While configuring

Re: mail transport unavailable for email in the queue

Marco Fioretti: > postfix/qmgr[3601]: warning: connect to transport private/dksign: > Connection refused And, you configured the dksign service as a content filter? In that case "postsuper -r ALL" (or postsuper -r queue_id). Wietse

Re: mail transport unavailable for email in the queue

in addition to what I just wrote, I realized only in this instant that an email from one of two IPs in mynetworks: mynetworks = 127.0.0.0/8, ip.1, ip.2 (THESE ARE FIXED IPS OF TWO is rejected with this message in the log: master.cf.orig:smtp inet n - n - - sm

mail transport unavailable for email in the queue

/qmgr[3601]: warning: connect to transport private/dksign: Connection refused and many errors like this, all from, AFAICT, messages in the queue: postfix/error[3640]: D7C00A4E96D: to=, relay=none, delay=144677, delays=144677/0.01/0/0.14, dsn=4.3.0, status=deferred (mail transport unavailable) The

Re: mail transport unavailable

* LuKreme : > > On 31 Jul 2013, at 21:52 , Noel Jones wrote: > > > Looks as if you clobbered your smtp transport "smtp unix ... smtp" > > > >> smtp inet n - n - 1 postscreen > >> smtpd pass - - n - - smtpd > > Am I suppos

Re: mail transport unavailable

On 31 Jul 2013, at 22:20 , LuKreme wrote: > smtp unix - - - - - smtp Well, yes, *that* was stupid. smtp unix - - n - - smtp *cough* Thanks Noel, wouldn't have gotten there without you. -- On a scale of one to ten, it sucked.

Re: mail transport unavailable

On 31 Jul 2013, at 21:52 , Noel Jones wrote: > Looks as if you clobbered your smtp transport "smtp unix ... smtp" > >> smtp inet n - n - 1 postscreen >> smtpd pass - - n - - smtpd Am I suppose to have three lines? adding

Re: mail transport unavailable

On 7/31/2013 8:33 PM, LuKreme wrote: > > On 31 Jul 2013, at 17:35 , Wietse Venema wrote: > >> >> http://www.postfix.org/DEBUG_README.html#logging > > Since I last stopped and started postfix (2.10.1): > > # egrep '(warning|error|fatal|panic):' /var/log/maillog > Jul 31 18:47:59 mail postfix/qm

Re: mail transport unavailable

/retry socket: wanted attribute: (list terminator) Jul 31 19:20:45 mail postfix/qmgr[89644]: input attribute name: (end) Jul 31 19:20:45 mail postfix/qmgr[89644]: qmgr_peer_select: E1588118AC34 retry 4.3.0 mail transport unavailable (1 of 5) and later Jul 31 19:20:45 mail postfix/qmgr[89644]: private

Re: mail transport unavailable

tting: > > Jul 31 13:10:20 mail postfix/error[71592]: A4A0D118B50A: to=<*munged*@ > gmail.com>, orig_to=, relay=none, delay=0.21, > delays=0.2/0/0/0.01, dsn=4.3.0, status=deferred (mail transport unavailable) > > This is happening on all the accounts that forward to gmail.

mail transport unavailable

]: A4A0D118B50A: to=<*munged*@ gmail.com>, orig_to=, relay=none, delay=0.21, delays=0.2/0/0/0.01, dsn=4.3.0, status=deferred (mail transport unavailable) This is happening on all the accounts that forward to gmail. # postconf -n alias_database = hash:$config_directory/aliases alias_maps

Re: Postfix mail transport unavailable

* Geoffrey R Hardin : > The errors are the same in verbose and in non-verbose mode. Yes, but non-verbose mode is easier to read! -- Ralf Hildebrandt Geschäftsbereich IT | Abteilung Netzwerk Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin Campus Benjamin Franklin Hindenburgdamm 30 | D-12203 Berlin

Re: Postfix mail transport unavailable

> postfix/master[18505]: warning: process /usr/lib/postfix/local pid 24308 > killed by signal 11 Signal 11 a.k.a. SIGSEGV. We could have found that hours ago, without being drowned by verbose logging. What libraries have you linked into Postfix? Do: $ ldd /usr/libexec/postfix/local and

Re: Postfix mail transport unavailable

owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org wrote on 08/04/2011 05:40:05 PM: > From: > > Wietse Venema > > To: > > Geoffrey R Hardin > > Cc: > > postfix users > > Date: > > 08/04/2011 05:40 PM > > Subject: > > Re: Postfix mail transport unavailable

Re: Postfix mail transport unavailable

1) DO NOT ENABLE VERBOSE LOGGING. People asked you twice, 2) DO Follow instructions in http://www.postfix.org/DEBUG_README.html#logging, as asked at least once. Wietse

Re: Postfix mail transport unavailable

owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org wrote on 08/04/2011 03:14:43 PM: > From: > > Noel Jones > > To: > > postfix-users@postfix.org > > Date: > > 08/04/2011 03:15 PM > > Subject: > > Re: Postfix mail transport unavailable > > Sent by: > >

Re: Postfix mail transport unavailable

to a relatively large mail alias (441 addresses), the system will process through 284 addresses and flag the message as unsent and put it back in the queue with the error message "mail transport unavailable". Unfortunately, the system is on a separate network so I can't easily pos

Re: Postfix mail transport unavailable

ne remaining problem we have is > that when we send mail to a relatively large mail alias (441 > addresses), the system will process through 284 addresses and flag > the message as unsent and put it back in the queue with the error > message "mail transport unavailable". U

Re: Postfix mail transport unavailable

On 2011-08-04 21:39, Geoffrey R Hardin wrote: Lots of stuff without real data. Please provide postconf -n output and relevant logs, as described in the link you were given when joining: http://www.postfix.org/DEBUG_README.html#mail -- J.

Postfix mail transport unavailable

relatively large mail alias (441 addresses), the system will process through 284 addresses and flag the message as unsent and put it back in the queue with the error message "mail transport unavailable". Unfortunately, the system is on a separate network so I can't easily post conf

Re: Silly question but I can't figure it out / postscreen implementation / mail transport unavailable

Bailey, Damian S.: > May 3 13:30:31 ubuntu-spam2 postfix/error[15293]: 0126F2235EB: > to=, relay=none, delay=927, > delays=927/0.03/0/0.07, dsn=4.3.0, status=deferred (mail transport > unavailable) > > I know it's due to changes I made to activate postscreen, but I hone

Re: Silly question but I can't figure it out / postscreen implementation / mail transport unavailable

-users@postfix.org > > Subject: Re: Silly question but I can't figure it out / postscreen > > implementation / mail transport unavailable > > > > On Tuesday, May 03, 2011 01:36:50 PM Bailey, Damian S. wrote: > > > Hey all, > > > > > > &g

RE: Silly question but I can't figure it out / postscreen implementation / mail transport unavailable

question but I can't figure it out / postscreen implementation / mail transport unavailable On Tuesday, May 03, 2011 01:36:50 PM Bailey, Damian S. wrote: > Hey all, > > > > I just updated by backup mail gateway (Postfix/Clam/SA/Amavis) to 2.8 to > use postscreen. > Y

Re: Silly question but I can't figure it out / postscreen implementation / mail transport unavailable

On Tuesday, May 03, 2011 01:36:50 PM Bailey, Damian S. wrote: > Hey all, > > > > I just updated by backup mail gateway (Postfix/Clam/SA/Amavis) to 2.8 to > use postscreen. > You may be suffering from this bug: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/764096 a duplicate report: https://bugs.launchpad

Silly question but I can't figure it out / postscreen implementation / mail transport unavailable

]: 0126F2235EB: to=, relay=none, delay=927, delays=927/0.03/0/0.07, dsn=4.3.0, status=deferred (mail transport unavailable) May 3 13:30:31 ubuntu-spam2 postfix/qmgr[12609]: 00993223528: from=, size=3367, nrcpt=1 (queue active) I know it's due to changes I made to activate postscreen, but I hon

RE: Mail Transport Unavailable

, _ Motty -Original Message- From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of /dev/rob0 Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2010 10:15 AM To: postfix-users@postfix.org Subject: Re: Mail Transport Unavailable Please do not top-post your replies. Thank you. On Tue

Re: Mail Transport Unavailable

Please do not top-post your replies. Thank you. On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 09:17:35AM -0800, motty cruz wrote: > FreeBSD 7.2 and Postfix 2.6.5 and I want to send email to myself > mo...@domain.com Please use example.com for examples. Example.TLD is reserved for examples in every top-level domain. Ho

Re: Mail Transport Unavailable

Time -Sender/Recipient--- > A4051B898 1938 Tue Feb 23 09:01:54 MAILER-DAEMON > (mail transport > unavailable) Third item from http://www.postfix.org/DEBUG_README.html#mail: Postfix logging. See the text at the top of t

RE: Mail Transport Unavailable

LER-DAEMON (mail transport unavailable) r...@domain.com -- 2 Kbytes in 1 Request. As you can see the message was sent but debug log was not sent to r...@doamin.com Below is my config file filter# postconf -n alias_database =

Re: Mail Transport Unavailable

On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 08:52:23AM -0800, motty cruz wrote: > If I use the command > # mail -v n...@domain.com I get the folloing > Mail delivery status report will be mailed to > But then I get MAILER-DAEMON (mail transport unavailable) > > Using FreeBSD 7.2 > Postf

Mail Transport Unavailable

Hello If I use the command # mail -v n...@domain.com I get the folloing Mail delivery status report will be mailed to But then I get MAILER-DAEMON (mail transport unavailable) Using FreeBSD 7.2 Postfix 2.6.5 And second instance running Thanks in advance _ Motty

Re: Problem with "mail transport unavailable"

Il giorno Gio 21 Gen 2010 18:19:07 CET, Michael Katz ha scritto: [...] In short, Wietse has earned a position of the highest regard and ultimate professional respect and insulting him is out of line on this list. In short, I'm not insulting anyone and I'm not frustrated. Keep up the good work!

Re: Problem with "mail transport unavailable"

RaSca wrote: Il giorno Gio 21 Gen 2010 17:21:52 CET, wie...@porcupine.org (Wietse Venema) ha scritto: [...] I asked you to egrep '(fatal|panic|error|etc)' but you thought you knew better and therefore lost time. Wietse You don't asked me anything, you just copied and pasted a README file.

Re: Problem with "mail transport unavailable"

Il giorno Gio 21 Gen 2010 17:21:52 CET, wie...@porcupine.org (Wietse Venema) ha scritto: [...] I asked you to egrep '(fatal|panic|error|etc)' but you thought you knew better and therefore lost time. Wietse You don't asked me anything, you just copied and pasted a README file. You are

Re: Problem with "mail transport unavailable"

RaSca: > Il giorno Gio 21 Gen 2010 16:33:23 CET, wie...@porcupine.org (Wietse > Venema) ha scritto: > > RaSca: > >>> http://www.postfix.org/DEBUG_README.html#logging > >>> Look for obvious signs of trouble > >> Hi, > >> I haven't found any message of this kind concerning the message group. > > I

Re: Problem with "mail transport unavailable"

Il giorno Gio 21 Gen 2010 16:33:23 CET, wie...@porcupine.org (Wietse Venema) ha scritto: RaSca: http://www.postfix.org/DEBUG_README.html#logging Look for obvious signs of trouble Hi, I haven't found any message of this kind concerning the message group. I suppose you overlooked this warning t

Re: Problem with "mail transport unavailable"

RaSca: > > http://www.postfix.org/DEBUG_README.html#logging > > Look for obvious signs of trouble > > Hi, > I haven't found any message of this kind concerning the message group. I suppose you overlooked this warning then. Jan 21 15:06:06 mail-2 postfix/qmgr[31542]: warning: connect to transpo

Re: Problem with "mail transport unavailable" (SOLVED)

Il giorno Gio 21 Gen 2010 14:33:16 CET, RaSca ha scritto: [...] What else should i check? I know that these information may be few for giving me help, but I'm trying to find out a way for understanding what is happening. Thanks to my friend Mauro, I finally solved the problem. The problem was

Re: Problem with "mail transport unavailable"

Il giorno Gio 21 Gen 2010 13:08:02 CET, wie...@porcupine.org (Wietse Venema) ha scritto: [...] http://www.postfix.org/DEBUG_README.html#logging Look for obvious signs of trouble Hi, I haven't found any message of this kind concerning the message group. As i wrote, Postfix works perfectly exce

Re: Problem with "mail transport unavailable"

mail-2 postfix/error[4716]: E2B4A208256: > to=, relay=none, delay=181215, > delays=181215/0.05/0/0.25, dsn=4.3.0, status=deferred (mail transport > unavailable) > > I've got many line like this one, the ID is identical for some lines so > it seems to be a retry. > All the daem

Problem with "mail transport unavailable"

relay=none, delay=181215, delays=181215/0.05/0/0.25, dsn=4.3.0, status=deferred (mail transport unavailable) I've got many line like this one, the ID is identical for some lines so it seems to be a retry. All the daemons are started (I've got postfix+spampd+clamav) and responsive (as

Re: mail transport unavailable

http://www.postfix.org/DEBUG_README.html#logging Look for obvious signs of trouble = Postfix logs all failed and successful deliveries to a logfile. The file is usually called /var/log/maillog or /var/log/mail; the exact pathname is defined in the /etc/syslog.conf

mail transport unavailable

configuration. Looking at logs , not alway but just sometimes i get this: Apr 9 22:16:54 mail postfix/error[18713]: 72882266C7: to=, relay=none, delay=72807, delays=72805/1.6/0/0.14, dsn=4.3.0, status=deferred (mail transport unavailable) Apr 9 22:16:54 mail postfix/smtpd[18736]: connect from

Re: Mail not delivered to local users: status=deferred (mail transport unavailable)

On Mar 29, 2009, at 5:10 PM, Wietse Venema wrote: Tobi: Hi All, I set up an after-queue content filter following the instructions on http://www.postfix.org/FILTER_README.html . Everything works fine except that mail directed to local users is deferred when it is re-injected to postfix after the

Re: Mail not delivered to local users: status=deferred (mail transport unavailable)

Tobi: > Hi All, > I set up an after-queue content filter following the instructions on > http://www.postfix.org/FILTER_README.html . > Everything works fine except that mail directed to local users is > deferred when it is re-injected to postfix after the content filter. > However, virtual and remo

Mail not delivered to local users: status=deferred (mail transport unavailable)

select: BA9452DA112C retry 4.3.0 mail transport unavailable (1 of 5) postfix/qmgr[22419]: qmgr_job_retire: BA9452DA112C postfix/qmgr[22419]: send attr queue_id = BA9452DA112C postfix/error[22442]: BA9452DA112C: to=, relay=none, delay=0.17, delays=0.02/0.13/0/0.02, dsn=4.3.0, status=deferred

Re: Re[7]: postfix 2.5 vmail hosting - Resource temporarily unavailable + mail transport unavailable - SOLVED

?li?s Tam?s: > Udv / Greetings! > > I did not have sysctl compiled in the kernel. that one caused the > problem. (the old .config become incmpatible with the new one and I > havent chacked is all options are in place) > I don't know what the affect of sysctl to postfix, but definately has. The ef

Re[7]: postfix 2.5 vmail hosting - Resource temporarily unavailable + mail transport unavailable - SOLVED

Udv / Greetings! I did not have sysctl compiled in the kernel. that one caused the problem. (the old .config become incmpatible with the new one and I havent chacked is all options are in place) I don't know what the affect of sysctl to postfix, but definately has. Sunday, November 2, 2008, 3:34:

Re: Re[5]: postfix 2.5 vmail hosting - Resource temporarily unavailable + mail transport unavailable

?li?s Tam?s: > Udv / Greetings! > > About the limits: > > ulimit -a > core file size (blocks, -c) 0 > data seg size (kbytes, -d) unlimited Etc. I have news for you. Computers do not have unlimited supplies of memory, sockets, files, etc. Wietse

Re[5]: postfix 2.5 vmail hosting - Resource temporarily unavailable + mail transport unavailable

Udv / Greetings! About the limits: ulimit -a core file size (blocks, -c) 0 data seg size (kbytes, -d) unlimited max nice(-e) 0 file size (blocks, -f) unlimited pending signals (-i) unlimited max locked memory (kbytes,

Re[4]: postfix 2.5 vmail hosting - Resource temporarily unavailable + mail transport unavailable

Udv / Greetings! Hm. I think process limit does not count here. I reinstalled it from the very basics. I tried it with a mail alias, that have 3 recipients, and I received the error. there were no other load on the mail server. It is a P3 dual 1GHZ, 76B U320SCSI. It shouldn't hang up on 3 mails.

Re: Re[2]: postfix 2.5 vmail hosting - Resource temporarily unavailable + mail transport unavailable

?li?s Tam?s: > Udv / Greetings! > > it is already set to 30 with > > default_process_limit = 30 > > I constantly get the errors: > > Oct 31 16:25:20 *** postfix/qmgr[7260]: warning: connect to transport > maildrop: Resource temporarily unavailable > Oct 31 16:25:20 *** postfix/qmgr[7260]: warn

Re[2]: postfix 2.5 vmail hosting - Resource temporarily unavailable + mail transport unavailable

ferred (mail transport unavailable) Oct 31 16:25:20 *** postfix/qmgr[7260]: 870C2100BC0: to=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, relay=none, delay=1.9, delays=1.7/0.17/0/0, dsn=4.3.0, status=deferred (mail transport unavailable) Oct 31 16:28:40 *** postfix/anvil[10453]: statistics: max connection rat

Re: postfix 2.5 vmail hosting - Resource temporarily unavailable + mail transport unavailable

?li?s Tam?s: > Oct 24 22:09:24 ** postfix/master[27379]: warning: master_wakeup_timer_event: > service tlsmgr(private/tlsmgr): Resource temporarily unavailable > Oct 24 22:33:54 *** postfix/qmgr[741]: warning: connect to transport > maildrop: Resource temporarily unavailable > Oct 24 22:33:54 ***

postfix 2.5 vmail hosting - Resource temporarily unavailable + mail transport unavailable - master.cf -

Udv / Greetings! Attachment dod not go through. I post my master.cf here: # == # service type private unpriv chroot wakeup maxproc command + args # (yes) (yes) (yes) (never) (100) # ===

postfix 2.5 vmail hosting - Resource temporarily unavailable + mail transport unavailable

transport retry: Resource temporarily unavailable Oct 24 22:33:54 *** postfix/qmgr[741]: D2CA1100BC1: to=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, orig_to=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, relay=none, delay=907, delays=907/0.17/0/0, dsn=4.3.0, status=deferred (mail transport unavailable) Oct 24 22:33:54 *** postfix/qmgr

Re: getting 'mail transport unavailable'

Thanks. I had added one transport which I had forgotten to add in master.cf (braindead). Regards, ANANT. Quoting "Duane Hill" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: On Fri, 19 Sep 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Dear List, I am getting mail transport unavailable for one specific domain

Re: getting 'mail transport unavailable'

On Fri, 19 Sep 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Dear List, I am getting mail transport unavailable for one specific domain 'elsevier.com'. How should I debug? We have recently upgraded to Postfix 2.5.5 running on AIX 5.3 OS. http://www.postfix.org/DEBUG_README.html See the

getting 'mail transport unavailable'

Dear List, I am getting mail transport unavailable for one specific domain 'elsevier.com'. How should I debug? We have recently upgraded to Postfix 2.5.5 running on AIX 5.3 OS. See the logs below. Sep 19 10:05:59 dnserns.isac.gov.in Message forwarded from dnserns: pos