Peter:
[ Charset ISO-8859-1 converted... ]
> On 05/04/2015 07:08 PM, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
> > I guess reading to the end of a short section of text is too much
> > work. :-)
>
> Duh, you got me:
>
> "With regular expression tables, Postfix only queries with the full
> recipient address, and not
On 05/04/2015 07:08 PM, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
> I guess reading to the end of a short section of text is too much
> work. :-)
Duh, you got me:
"With regular expression tables, Postfix only queries with the full
recipient address, and not with the bare username or the "@domain.tld"
wild-card."
S
On Mon, May 04, 2015 at 05:44:35PM +1200, Peter wrote:
> > There is no bug. The behaviour is correct as documented. Pity,
> > the documentation was not in the place you expected to find it.
>
> According to LOCAL_RECIPIENT_README:
>
> * In the left-hand side, specify a bare username, an "@doma
On 05/04/2015 05:33 PM, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
> The full syntax is documented in:
>
> http://www.postfix.org/LOCAL_RECIPIENT_README.html#format
>
> There should perhaps be a cross-reference to that or a cut/paste
> into the documentation for the parameter.
Yes, that's why I specified where
On Mon, May 04, 2015 at 05:02:29PM +1200, Peter wrote:
> The
> postconf(5) docs for the local_recipient_maps setting does not state
> whether the keys in this table should include a domain name or just a
> username part without the @domain suffix.
The full syntax is documented in:
http://w
This was brought to my attention by someone in the #postfix IRC channel
the other day and I felt it deserved some testing and passing on. The
postconf(5) docs for the local_recipient_maps setting does not state
whether the keys in this table should include a domain name or just a
username part wit
