On Jul 23, 2015, at 10:26 AM, Sascha Hüdepohl wrote:
> So my question is: Are there any reasonable reasons to have an invalid
> helo hostname or should i relax my settings?
That all depends on the value of “reasonable” you have.
To my mind, no, there is not. There are MANY mail servers that wil
On Thu, 23 Jul 2015 18:26:57 +0200
Sascha Hüdepohl wrote:
> So my question is: Are there any reasonable reasons to have an invalid
> helo hostname or should i relax my settings?
No reasonable reasons, IMHO. You may consider to whitelist them; be
carefull, it is not straight and simple... :-)
Luc
On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 06:26:57PM +0200, Sascha H?depohl wrote:
> So my question is: Are there any reasonable reasons to have an invalid
> helo hostname.
The sender is too cost/risk averse to make an effort to fix their
broken system. Whether that's reasonable depends on context.
> or should I
Hi!
Currently i'm in contact with someone who has the helo set to an invalid
hostname. Mails from their system are therefor rejected by my mailserver
beacuse i have:
smtpd_recipient_restrictions =
reject_invalid_helo_hostname
reject_unknown_helo_hostname
reject_non_fqdn_helo_hostname
Th
