On 2022-01-17 at 11:12:50 UTC-0500 (Mon, 17 Jan 2022 11:12:50 -0500)
Jim Popovitch
is rumored to have said:
I'm trying to get a complex header_check to work, and unfortunately it
isn't.
Right, because header_check cannot do what you're trying to do, as
documented.
The 'if' construct in hea
On 1/17/2022 10:12 AM, Jim Popovitch wrote:
Hello!
I'm trying to get a complex header_check to work, and unfortunately it
isn't. :( I started in #postfix and figured I would follow up here too.
The goal is to put mail on HOLD if it is not spam and is destined for 2
role accounts. Any help i
Hello!
I'm trying to get a complex header_check to work, and unfortunately it
isn't. :( I started in #postfix and figured I would follow up here too.
The goal is to put mail on HOLD if it is not spam and is destined for 2
role accounts. Any help is much appreciated.
~$ cat header_checks.pcre
g...@holiness.ch:
> If I understand correctly, without the if-endif conditional, the only way to
> exit header_checks before reaching the end of the file is if a REJECT action
> is matched. There's no way for me to say "This email is from my wife, so
> accept the email
Wietse,
Thank you for adding if-endif to header and body checks. A report on
About.com states that in 2010 there were about 294 billion emails sent per
day, 90% of which were spam. With numbers like that, trying to go through
and blacklist individual IP addresses or users is a waste of time
