On 7 Jun 2015, at 0:08, Chuck Peters wrote:
Bill Cole said:
On 3 Jun 2015, at 9:15, John Allen wrote:
Is there any way of testing for and refusing un-encrypted email?
The generic answer is "yes" but you need to define what you mean to
pick a mechanism.
If you mean email must be sent and re
Bill Cole said:
> On 3 Jun 2015, at 9:15, John Allen wrote:
>
> >Is there any way of testing for and refusing un-encrypted email?
>
> The generic answer is "yes" but you need to define what you mean to
> pick a mechanism.
>
> If you mean email must be sent and received over an encrypted
> transp
On 3 Jun 2015, at 10:49, James B. Byrne wrote:
On Wed, June 3, 2015 10:41, Bill Cole wrote:
Note that if you want maximal protection for both message metadata
(headers and SMTP envelope) and content both in transit and after
delivery, you have a very large problem space that has ultimately
frus
On Wed, June 3, 2015 10:41, Bill Cole wrote:
> Note that if you want maximal protection for both message metadata
> (headers and SMTP envelope) and content both in transit and after
> delivery, you have a very large problem space that has ultimately
> frustrated some very smart people, including P
On 3 Jun 2015, at 9:15, John Allen wrote:
Is there any way of testing for and refusing un-encrypted email?
The generic answer is "yes" but you need to define what you mean to pick
a mechanism.
If you mean email must be sent and received over an encrypted transport,
e.g. TLS, it is simply a
John Allen:
> > What level of encryption are you contextualizing? STARTTLS between
> > SMTP peers; or the message itself using S/MIME or PGP/GPG; or
> > something else?
> >
> The message itself (S/MIME or PGP/GPG).
> Its a medical practice. They have sending under control, but they are
> concerne
On 2015-06-03 9:42 AM, James B. Byrne wrote:
On Wed, June 3, 2015 09:15, John Allen wrote:
Is there any way of testing for and refusing un-encrypted email?
secondary, would it be possible to do this based upon the recipient.
default would be encrypted, but email directed at some recipients may
b
On Wed, June 3, 2015 09:15, John Allen wrote:
> Is there any way of testing for and refusing un-encrypted email?
> secondary, would it be possible to do this based upon the recipient.
> default would be encrypted, but email directed at some recipients may
> be
> in plain text.
>
What level of enc
Is there any way of testing for and refusing un-encrypted email?
secondary, would it be possible to do this based upon the recipient.
default would be encrypted, but email directed at some recipients may be
in plain text.
