Re: header_checks REJECT

2010-07-02 Thread /dev/rob0
[top-posting fixed] On Fri, Jul 02, 2010 at 07:25:41AM -0400, David Hill wrote: > On Thu, Jul 01, 2010 at 10:06:29PM +0200, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote: > > * David Hill : > > > soft_bounce = yes > > > > turn it off > > > Still, shouldn't the logfile show what actually was returned? The log shows wh

Re: header_checks REJECT

2010-07-02 Thread David Hill
Still, shouldn't the logfile show what actually was returned? On Thu, Jul 01, 2010 at 10:06:29PM +0200, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote: > * David Hill : > > soft_bounce = yes > > turn it off > > -- > Ralf Hildebrandt > Geschäftsbereich IT | Abteilung Netzwerk > Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin

Re: header_checks REJECT

2010-07-01 Thread David Hill
AHHH, thanks for that. hidden in my config Sorry for the noise. On Thu, Jul 01, 2010 at 10:06:29PM +0200, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote: > * David Hill : > > soft_bounce = yes > > turn it off > > -- > Ralf Hildebrandt > Geschäftsbereich IT | Abteilung Netzwerk > Charité - Universitätsmedizin

Re: header_checks REJECT

2010-07-01 Thread Ralf Hildebrandt
* David Hill : > soft_bounce = yes turn it off -- Ralf Hildebrandt Geschäftsbereich IT | Abteilung Netzwerk Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin Campus Benjamin Franklin Hindenburgdamm 30 | D-12203 Berlin Tel. +49 30 450 570 155 | Fax: +49 30 450 570 962 ralf.hildebra...@charite.de |

Re: header_checks REJECT

2010-07-01 Thread David Hill
On Thu, Jul 01, 2010 at 02:46:19PM -0500, Noel Jones wrote: > On 7/1/2010 2:15 PM, David Hill wrote: > >On Thu, Jul 01, 2010 at 02:35:22PM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote: > >>David Hill: > >>>Hello, > >>> > >>>I am using Postfix 2.7.1. The header_checks manpage says REJECT will > >>>insert a default e

Re: header_checks REJECT

2010-07-01 Thread Noel Jones
On 7/1/2010 2:15 PM, David Hill wrote: On Thu, Jul 01, 2010 at 02:35:22PM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote: David Hill: Hello, I am using Postfix 2.7.1. The header_checks manpage says REJECT will insert a default enhanced status code of 5.7.1 if the optional text is not specified. However, the ser

Re: header_checks REJECT

2010-07-01 Thread David Hill
On Thu, Jul 01, 2010 at 02:35:22PM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote: > David Hill: > > Hello, > > > > I am using Postfix 2.7.1. The header_checks manpage says REJECT will > > insert a default enhanced status code of 5.7.1 if the optional text is > > not specified. However, the server gives back 450 4.

Re: header_checks REJECT

2010-07-01 Thread Wietse Venema
David Hill: > Hello, > > I am using Postfix 2.7.1. The header_checks manpage says REJECT will > insert a default enhanced status code of 5.7.1 if the optional text is > not specified. However, the server gives back 450 4.7.1. > > 220 mail.server.com ESMTP Postfix > EHLO hostname > 250-mail.ser

header_checks REJECT

2010-07-01 Thread David Hill
Hello, I am using Postfix 2.7.1. The header_checks manpage says REJECT will insert a default enhanced status code of 5.7.1 if the optional text is not specified. However, the server gives back 450 4.7.1. 220 mail.server.com ESMTP Postfix EHLO hostname 250-mail.server.com 250-PIPELINING 250-SIZ