Florin Andrei wrote:
> Mikael Bak wrote:
>>
>> Is it really recommended to run a mail server that accepts email from
>> outside with non static IP address?
>>
>> I would not do it.
>
> As long as the dynamic DNS service works well, and the IP address only
> changes very rarely, why not?
>
Hi,
Yo
Mikael Bak wrote:
Is it really recommended to run a mail server that accepts email from
outside with non static IP address?
I would not do it.
As long as the dynamic DNS service works well, and the IP address only
changes very rarely, why not?
I've been doing this for close to a decade now
Florin Andrei:
> Wietse Venema wrote:
> > Florin Andrei:
> >> Florin Andrei wrote:
> >>> Is there a way to bind the listener to an interface using the interface
> >>> name (eth5:smtp) instead of the IP (1.2.3.4:smtp)?
> >
> > No. The bind(2) system call specifies an address. Not an interface,
> >
2009/8/12 Florin Andrei :
Is there a way to bind the listener to an interface using the interface
name (eth5:smtp) instead of the IP (1.2.3.4:smtp)?
>>
>> No. The bind(2) system call specifies an address. Not an interface,
>> and not the route. Connections with source address of X are not
Hi,
Florin Andrei wrote:
> Running Postfix 2.5.5 on Linux. The system is multihomed, connected to
> several private networks, and to the Internet with a dynamic DNS hostname.
>
Is it really recommended to run a mail server that accepts email from
outside with non static IP address?
I would not
Wietse Venema wrote:
Florin Andrei:
Florin Andrei wrote:
Is there a way to bind the listener to an interface using the interface
name (eth5:smtp) instead of the IP (1.2.3.4:smtp)?
No. The bind(2) system call specifies an address. Not an interface,
and not the route. Connections with source ad
Florin Andrei:
> Florin Andrei wrote:
> >
> > Is there a way to bind the listener to an interface using the interface
> > name (eth5:smtp) instead of the IP (1.2.3.4:smtp)?
No. The bind(2) system call specifies an address. Not an interface,
and not the route. Connections with source address of X
Florin Andrei wrote:
Is there a way to bind the listener to an interface using the interface
name (eth5:smtp) instead of the IP (1.2.3.4:smtp)?
Also, you know what would *really* help? The ability to say: "bind to
all interfaces except this one", by name. That would be really, really
neat.
Running Postfix 2.5.5 on Linux. The system is multihomed, connected to
several private networks, and to the Internet with a dynamic DNS hostname.
I'm using Amavisd-new with SpamAssassin and a bunch of other things to
filter email. Currently all email is filtered by Amavis. But I want to
only f