Re: failover for check_policy_service

2008-10-06 Thread Jan P. Kessler
J. Thomsen schrieb: This is the rationale behind an optional 'dunno if failing' on check_policy_service components. I wrote a little ha and loadbalacing script for policy delegation requests in perl some time ago. Maybe it is useful for you. Doc: http://postfwd.org/DEVEL/hapolicy-0.99.1.html

Re: failover for check_policy_service

2008-09-22 Thread Wietse Venema
J . Thomsen: > Wietse, > > > >If we don't care that Postfix handles mail correctly, why go through > >the trouble of setting up an SQL database in the first place? > > Things do not always come as one-bit on/off issues. > > E.g. my ISP has an option of delivering a guaranteed 2Mbit ADSL line,

Re: failover for check_policy_service

2008-09-22 Thread J . Thomsen
Wietse, >If we don't care that Postfix handles mail correctly, why go through >the trouble of setting up an SQL database in the first place? Things do not always come as one-bit on/off issues. E.g. my ISP has an option of delivering a guaranteed 2Mbit ADSL line, but if the capacity falls to 1.

Re: failover for check_policy_service

2008-09-21 Thread Wietse Venema
J . Thomsen: > >So it would comfortable if the postfix accepts all mails when > >the sqlgrey is ot of order. > > We are facing the same problem. > > Are there any new thoughts from the official maintainers of Postfix about > implementing a 'dunno' fallback on a failing check_policy_service ? > >

Re: failover for check_policy_service

2008-09-21 Thread J . Thomsen
>So it would comfortable if the postfix accepts all mails when >the sqlgrey is ot of order. We are facing the same problem. Are there any new thoughts from the official maintainers of Postfix about implementing a 'dunno' fallback on a failing check_policy_service ? The current 4xx solution will