J. Thomsen schrieb:
This is the rationale behind an optional 'dunno if failing' on
check_policy_service components.
I wrote a little ha and loadbalacing script for policy delegation
requests in perl some time ago. Maybe it is useful for you.
Doc:
http://postfwd.org/DEVEL/hapolicy-0.99.1.html
J . Thomsen:
> Wietse,
>
>
> >If we don't care that Postfix handles mail correctly, why go through
> >the trouble of setting up an SQL database in the first place?
>
> Things do not always come as one-bit on/off issues.
>
> E.g. my ISP has an option of delivering a guaranteed 2Mbit ADSL line,
Wietse,
>If we don't care that Postfix handles mail correctly, why go through
>the trouble of setting up an SQL database in the first place?
Things do not always come as one-bit on/off issues.
E.g. my ISP has an option of delivering a guaranteed 2Mbit ADSL line, but if
the capacity falls to 1.
J . Thomsen:
> >So it would comfortable if the postfix accepts all mails when
> >the sqlgrey is ot of order.
>
> We are facing the same problem.
>
> Are there any new thoughts from the official maintainers of Postfix about
> implementing a 'dunno' fallback on a failing check_policy_service ?
>
>
>So it would comfortable if the postfix accepts all mails when
>the sqlgrey is ot of order.
We are facing the same problem.
Are there any new thoughts from the official maintainers of Postfix about
implementing a 'dunno' fallback on a failing check_policy_service ?
The current 4xx solution will