Re: execvp failure but command seems to be there

2022-03-29 Thread Roger Klorese
No. Thanks. It was a long-leftover 32-bit binary in the wrong place. Sent from my iPhone > On Mar 29, 2022, at 4:23 AM, Wietse Venema wrote: > > Wietse

Re: execvp failure but command seems to be there

2022-03-29 Thread Wietse Venema
Roger Klorese: > CentOS 7.9 with SELinux off. > > Log shows: > > Mar 28 11:29:16 divine postfix/pipe[2685]: 21FE73000171E: > to=, relay=sympa, > delay=599, delays=599/0.06/0/0.04, dsn=4.3.0, status=deferred (temporary > failure. Command output: pipe: fatal: pipe_command: execvp > /var/sympa/b

Re: execvp failure but command seems to be there

2022-03-28 Thread Viktor Dukhovni
On Mon, Mar 28, 2022 at 11:38:12AM -0700, Roger Klorese wrote: > CentOS 7.9 with SELinux off. Are you sure about that? > Mar 28 11:29:16 divine postfix/pipe[2685]: 21FE73000171E: > to=, relay=sympa, > delay=599, delays=599/0.06/0/0.04, dsn=4.3.0, status=deferred (temporary > failure. Command

execvp failure but command seems to be there

2022-03-28 Thread Roger Klorese
CentOS 7.9 with SELinux off. Log shows: Mar 28 11:29:16 divine postfix/pipe[2685]: 21FE73000171E: to=, relay=sympa, delay=599, delays=599/0.06/0/0.04, dsn=4.3.0, status=deferred (temporary failure. Command output: pipe: fatal: pipe_command: execvp /var/sympa/bin/queue: No such file or direct