On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 11:36:13AM +0300, Vladimir Vassiliev wrote:
> Thanks. Exactly what I needed.
> al...@example.com us...@example.com, us...@example.com
> Why don't drop RHS domain here (if example.com is local)?
Because you may regret it later, unqualified addresses are implicitly
qua
Thanks. Exactly what I needed.
al...@example.com us...@example.com, us...@example.com
Why don't drop RHS domain here (if example.com is local)?
> Whenever possible, for mapping an inpu address to a set of users, use
> virtual aliases instead.
>
> virtual(5):
> # Drop the LHS doma
On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 11:48:55AM +0300, Vladimir Vassiliev wrote:
>
> I discovered next issue with postfix.
> Suppose there is alias:
> alias:user1, user2
>
> If delivery to user1 was successful and to user2 was not (and it was
> tempfail or soft_bounce=yes), then next time pos
I discovered next issue with postfix.
Suppose there is alias:
alias: user1, user2
If delivery to user1 was successful and to user2 was not (and it was tempfail
or soft_bounce=yes), then next time postfix will deliver to user1 also.
Is this behavior also conditional by architecture of Po