Re: duplicate delivery on tempfail

2009-12-22 Thread Victor Duchovni
On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 11:36:13AM +0300, Vladimir Vassiliev wrote: > Thanks. Exactly what I needed. > al...@example.com us...@example.com, us...@example.com > Why don't drop RHS domain here (if example.com is local)? Because you may regret it later, unqualified addresses are implicitly qua

Re: duplicate delivery on tempfail

2009-12-22 Thread Vladimir Vassiliev
Thanks. Exactly what I needed. al...@example.com us...@example.com, us...@example.com Why don't drop RHS domain here (if example.com is local)? > Whenever possible, for mapping an inpu address to a set of users, use > virtual aliases instead. > > virtual(5): > # Drop the LHS doma

Re: duplicate delivery on tempfail

2009-12-21 Thread Victor Duchovni
On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 11:48:55AM +0300, Vladimir Vassiliev wrote: > > I discovered next issue with postfix. > Suppose there is alias: > alias:user1, user2 > > If delivery to user1 was successful and to user2 was not (and it was > tempfail or soft_bounce=yes), then next time pos

duplicate delivery on tempfail

2009-12-21 Thread Vladimir Vassiliev
I discovered next issue with postfix. Suppose there is alias: alias: user1, user2 If delivery to user1 was successful and to user2 was not (and it was tempfail or soft_bounce=yes), then next time postfix will deliver to user1 also. Is this behavior also conditional by architecture of Po