On 10/23/2013 6:22 AM, Kovács Albert wrote:
> On the QSHAPE_REAME page you say that "try to keep the volume of
> local mail injection to a moderate level."
>
> Can you give me a rough estimation on "moderate level" for such an
> environment where the only source of messages
> is the local injectio
Kov?cs Albert:
> Hello Wietse,
>thanks for the clarification, I'd stick to a stable and supported
>method.
Thanks. And I with I had a better answer.
Speaking which, Postfix supports QMQP. This protocol is simpler
than SMTP, designed by Dan Bernstein, and is based on netstrings.
Netstrings are sim
Hello Wietse,
thanks for the clarification, I'd stick to a stable and supported method.
On the QSHAPE_REAME page you say that "try to keep the volume of local mail
injection to a moderate level."
Can you give me a rough estimation on "moderate level" for such an environment
where the only sour
Kov?cs Albert:
>I wouldn't use a regular smtp chat with the postfix smtpd daemon,
>because I don't want to block the application until smtpd receives
>the message.
There is no need to "block the application". Use parallism.
>My next idea is to just modify the application, and drop (with the
>link
Hello,
I have an application that during its operation it generates lots of RFC-822
format emails.
My task is to send them to a single remote email address, and I've decided that
I rely on
postfix to do the job.
I wouldn't use a regular smtp chat with the postfix smtpd daemon, because I
don't
