martin f krafft a écrit :
> also sprach Wietse Venema [2009.05.22.2010 +0200]:
Is it possiblew to instruct postfix to always deliver to a different
port when it tries to connect to a specific machine?
>>> iptables is not an option, since it cannot (yet) translate
>>> destination sockets
On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 08:41:45PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Wietse Venema [2009.05.22.2010 +0200]:
> > > > Is it possiblew to instruct postfix to always deliver to a different
> > > > port when it tries to connect to a specific machine?
> > >
> > > iptables is not an option, si
also sprach Wietse Venema [2009.05.22.2010 +0200]:
> > > Is it possiblew to instruct postfix to always deliver to a different
> > > port when it tries to connect to a specific machine?
> >
> > iptables is not an option, since it cannot (yet) translate
> > destination sockets for IPv6. Sorry, shou
martin f krafft:
> also sprach martin f krafft [2009.05.22.1919 +0200]:
> > Is it possiblew to instruct postfix to always deliver to a different
> > port when it tries to connect to a specific machine?
>
> iptables is not an option, since it cannot (yet) translate
> destination sockets for IPv6.
also sprach martin f krafft [2009.05.22.1919 +0200]:
> Is it possiblew to instruct postfix to always deliver to a different
> port when it tries to connect to a specific machine?
iptables is not an option, since it cannot (yet) translate
destination sockets for IPv6. Sorry, should have mentioned.
I need to deliver mail to the primary MX of several hundred domains
via a different port. Unfortunately, putting the MX's address or IP
into the transport map does not seem to work. I'd prefer not to
maintain the list of domains in the transport table as well, so I am
wondering:
Is it possiblew to
