Viktor Dukhovni:
>src/smtpd/smtpd_resolve.c:
> lowercase(STR(reply->recipient)); /* XXX */
Wietse Venema:
> This may have escaped the code cleanup when forced lowercase
> was removed from access maps.
Fabio Sangiovanni:
> Thanks for your answer, Wietse. Should we then expe
Wietse Venema porcupine.org> writes:
>
> Viktor Dukhovni:
> >src/smtpd/smtpd_resolve.c:
> > lowercase(STR(reply->recipient)); /* XXX */
>
> This may have escaped the code cleanup when forced lowercase
> was removed from access maps.
>
> Wietse
>
>
Thanks for your
Viktor Dukhovni:
>src/smtpd/smtpd_resolve.c:
> lowercase(STR(reply->recipient)); /* XXX */
This may have escaped the code cleanup when forced lowercase
was removed from access maps.
Wietse
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 08:25:43PM +0100, Fabio Sangiovanni wrote:
> > Addresses used in access checks are case folded in Postfix upstream
> > of the access table. The original address goes into the queue file,
> > but access checks use case folded addresses.
>
> Is it maybe the case to update t
Viktor Dukhovni dukhovni.org> writes:
> Sorry, I don't do pastebins. If you want help include the relevant
> information in your message.
Relevant (long piece of) information included at the end of this message :)
> Addresses used in access checks are case folded in Postfix upstream
> of the
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 09:35:40AM +, Fabio Sangiovanni wrote:
> > > This behaviour is correct, but I can't get it using the restriction
> > > in postfix.
> >
> > The Postfix table layer is at the mercy of any upstream rewriting.
> > Are you sure your input address is not mapped to lower case
Viktor Dukhovni dukhovni.org> writes:
>
> On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 05:44:45PM +0100, Fabio Sangiovanni wrote:
>
> > $ postmap -q 'test domain.tld' \
> > regexp:/etc/postfix/check_recipient_access.regexp
> > REJECT wrong format
> >
> > while:
> > $ postmap -q 'tEsT domain.tld' \
> > re
On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 05:44:45PM +0100, Fabio Sangiovanni wrote:
> Hi, thanks for your answer. I'm sorry but I can't get the point here.
> I *want* case sensitive matching. To me, the manual says that, due
> to the fact that insensitive matching is on by default, one should
> append the flag to
Viktor Dukhovni dukhovni.org> writes:
>
> On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 04:35:48PM +0100, Fabio Sangiovanni wrote:
>
> > I'm trying to figure out how case sensitivity works in a
> > check_recipient_access regexp table (Postfix 2.6.6).
>
> Try the documentation:
>
> http://www.postfix.org/regexp_ta
On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 04:35:48PM +0100, Fabio Sangiovanni wrote:
> I'm trying to figure out how case sensitivity works in a
> check_recipient_access regexp table (Postfix 2.6.6).
Try the documentation:
http://www.postfix.org/regexp_table.5.html
http://www.postfix.org/pcre_table.5.html
Hello list,
I'm trying to figure out how case sensitivity works in a
check_recipient_access regexp table (Postfix 2.6.6).
This is my main.cf:
alias_database = hash:/etc/aliases
alias_maps = hash:/etc/aliases
allow_min_user = yes
command_directory = /usr/sbin
config_directory = /etc/postfix
dae
11 matches
Mail list logo