--On Tuesday, February 16, 2010 11:13 PM -0500 Victor Duchovni
wrote:
On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 06:08:21PM -0800, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
I noticed in the release notes that Postfix 2.7 receives the full
message before sending it to the before-queue milter, but I don't
think this addresse
On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 06:08:21PM -0800, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
>>> I noticed in the release notes that Postfix 2.7 receives the full
>>> message before sending it to the before-queue milter, but I don't think
>>> this addresses the concern.
>>
>> Milter applications see SMTP commands as th
--On Tuesday, February 16, 2010 8:51 PM -0500 Wietse Venema
wrote:
Quanah Gibson-Mount:
We've some features (such as DKIM signing) we'd like to deploy, but
currently the only program that meets our requirements is OpenDKIM,
which is available as a before-queue milter. However, we've a conce
Quanah Gibson-Mount:
> We've some features (such as DKIM signing) we'd like to deploy, but
> currently the only program that meets our requirements is OpenDKIM, which
> is available as a before-queue milter. However, we've a concern about
> using such milters, specifically, if the milter is bro
On Tue, 16 Feb 2010, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
> We've some features (such as DKIM signing) we'd like to deploy, but
> currently the only program that meets our requirements is OpenDKIM,
> which is available as a before-queue milter. However, we've a
> concern about using such milters, specifica
We've some features (such as DKIM signing) we'd like to deploy, but
currently the only program that meets our requirements is OpenDKIM, which
is available as a before-queue milter. However, we've a concern about
using such milters, specifically, if the milter is broken or times out lots
of ema
