* Fourhundred Thecat:
> What is the legitimate reason to use base64 encoded emails ?
Languages with an alphabet size of more than the puny 26 characters used
in English, for example. ;-) While quoted-printable encoding would do as
well in many cases, MUAs may opt to use base64 instead.
Dnia 18.10.2019 o godz. 08:53:38 Bernardo Reino pisze:
> On 2019-10-17 12:17, Jaroslaw Rafa wrote:
> >So you just can't block HTML, because you'll cut yourself off of many
> >important messages that you actually want to receive. (However, I give
> >HTML-only messages without a plaintext part quite
On 2019-10-17 12:17, Jaroslaw Rafa wrote:
So you just can't block HTML, because you'll cut yourself off of many
important messages that you actually want to receive. (However, I give
HTML-only messages without a plaintext part quite a large spam score in
my
antispam filter).
Interesting to re
> What is the legitimate reason to use base64 encoded emails ?
i see quite a lot of legitimate email as base64 encoded
> Seems to me, it is only being used by spammers to complicate
> body_checks
any modern checker can and will decode base64 or indeed other message
details (the cost of
On 17 Oct 2019, at 08:35, Bill Cole
wrote:
> On 17 Oct 2019, at 7:51, @lbutlr wrote:
>> Also., of course, some plaintext messages still have to be en=E2=85=BDoded=
>> .
>>
>> Like this one.
>
> But not always in Base64. :)
True, the sender rarely has any control over how the message is encoded
On 17 Oct 2019, at 7:51, @lbutlr wrote:
Also., of course, some plaintext messages still have to be
en=E2=85=BDoded=
.
Like this one.
But not always in Base64. :)
Many clients only do QP or only do Base64 when the content makes it
necessary, some make a judgment call based (usually) on the
On 17 Oct 2019, at 4:48, Fourhundred Thecat wrote:
Hello,
I would like to ask what the Postfix community thinks about base64
encoded emails.
They are necessary.
What is the legitimate reason to use base64 encoded emails ?
Any characters outside of the US-ASCII set must be encoded using
On 10/17/19 4:48 AM, Fourhundred Thecat wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I would like to ask what the Postfix community thinks about base64
> encoded emails.
>
> What is the legitimate reason to use base64 encoded emails ?
>
> Seems to me, it is only being used by spammers to complica
On 17 Oct 2019, at 02:48, Fourhundred Thecat <400the...@gmx.ch> wrote:
> I believe email should be plaintext. I don't like HTML emails either. If
> somebody feels that his message needs fancy formatting, he should send
> it as pdf attachment. But emails should stay plaintext.
Have fun with that wi
Dnia 17.10.2019 o godz. 10:48:21 Fourhundred Thecat pisze:
>
> I believe email should be plaintext. I don't like HTML emails either. If
> somebody feels that his message needs fancy formatting, he should send
> it as pdf attachment. But emails should stay plaintext.
I second that emails should be
Hi
on 2019/10/17 16:48, Fourhundred Thecat wrote:
I believe email should be plaintext. I don't like HTML emails either. If
somebody feels that his message needs fancy formatting, he should send
it as pdf attachment. But emails should stay plaintext.
non-latin message body should be encoded for
Hello,
I would like to ask what the Postfix community thinks about base64
encoded emails.
What is the legitimate reason to use base64 encoded emails ?
Seems to me, it is only being used by spammers to complicate body_checks
Would it be crazy to want to configure Postfix to not accept base64
12 matches
Mail list logo
