Sean Greenslade writes:
> On Mon, Sep 05, 2016 at 08:17:40PM +0200, Sebastian Nielsen wrote:
>> Sean Greenslade:
>> Thats the responsibility of the server who is authorized to act on behalf of
>> that domain.
>
> Yes, however I am trying to make this discussion relevant to the OP's
> question. Au
On Mon, Sep 05, 2016 at 08:17:40PM +0200, Sebastian Nielsen wrote:
> Sean Greenslade:
> Thats the responsibility of the server who is authorized to act on behalf of
> that domain.
Yes, however I am trying to make this discussion relevant to the OP's
question. Authenticating based solely on origina
t I would trust a postfix implementation more.
Original Message
From: Sebastian Nielsen
Sent: Monday, September 5, 2016 11:18 AM
To: postfix-users@postfix.org
Subject: SV: SV: advice on securing a transport
LazyGranch:
I look it at the point of view of the server who are receiving the mail.
So basical
LazyGranch:
I look it at the point of view of the server who are receiving the mail.
So basically, the OP has some email adress like "webapprecei...@example.org"
that receives mail and processes this automatically into a database.
Only authorized users are allowed to send to this specifically craf
pers that a client which could flag failed DKIM and SPF was
worthy. Their solution was look at the header.
Original Message
From: Sebastian Nielsen
Sent: Monday, September 5, 2016 10:24 AM
To: postfix-users@postfix.org
Subject: SV: advice on securing a transport
No, you're wrong. What the O
On Mon, Sep 05, 2016 at 07:23:10PM +0200, Sebastian Nielsen wrote:
> No, you're wrong. What the OP should do, is to enforce SPF/DKIM on
> specific RECEIVERS. For example, enforcing SPF/DKIM on for example
> webappad...@example.org.
It's important to remember what each step is actually authenticati
ör li...@lazygranch.com
Skickat: den 5 september 2016 19:20
Till: postfix-users@postfix.org
Ämne: Re: advice on securing a transport
First of all, be wary taking advice from a newbie like me. That said, if you
enforce SPF and DKIM in postfix, you will be rejecting a lot of mail. If there
is a way to enforce SP
, but this mail
will, if I understand the objective, with be "machine" read. That step is where
you want to enforce SPF and DKIM.
Original Message
From: Sebastian Nielsen
Sent: Monday, September 5, 2016 9:54 AM
To: postfix-users@postfix.org
Subject: SV: advice on securing a
ected.
-Ursprungligt meddelande-
Från: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org
[mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org] För Sean Greenslade
Skickat: den 5 september 2016 18:36
Till: Eric Abrahamsen
Kopia: postfix-users@postfix.org
Ämne: Re: advice on securing a transport
On Mon, Sep 05, 2016 at 07:52:02PM +0800,
On Mon, Sep 05, 2016 at 07:52:02PM +0800, Eric Abrahamsen wrote:
> I have a postfix/dovecot installation on the same server as my company's
> webapp. This webapp involves a lot of regular data entry, which is a
> real pain to do using HTML forms. What I would really like to do is be
> able to send
I have a postfix/dovecot installation on the same server as my company's
webapp. This webapp involves a lot of regular data entry, which is a
real pain to do using HTML forms. What I would really like to do is be
able to send structured emails to the server, and have postfix pass them
through a tra
11 matches
Mail list logo
