On Sat, Jan 24, 2009 at 09:15:27AM +0100, mouss wrote:
> >>IN MC 10 mail2.freewayprojects.com.
> >
> > This requirement was relaxed in RFC 2821. It is OK (though still
> > better not to if not necessary) to use CNAMES.
>
> my understanding is that RFC 5321 "went back". at least, this is what
Victor Duchovni a écrit :
> On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 08:53:21PM +0100, mouss wrote:
>
>> wrong.
>>
>> the MX should not be a cname. see
>> http://www.rfc-ignorant.org/policy-bogusmx.php
>>
>> use
>> IN MC 10 mail2.freewayprojects.com.
>
> This requirement was relaxed in RFC 2821. It is O
On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 08:53:21PM +0100, mouss wrote:
> wrong.
>
> the MX should not be a cname. see
> http://www.rfc-ignorant.org/policy-bogusmx.php
>
> use
> IN MC 10 mail2.freewayprojects.com.
This requirement was relaxed in RFC 2821. It is OK (though still
better not to if not
Kevin Bailey a écrit :
> Hi Guys,
>
> Just a question RE setting up the DNS zone record correctly for a mail
> server.
>
> I have a couple of setups which work but have just copied one and I'm
> getting the following response.
>
> : Host or domain name not found. Name
> service
>error for na
Hi Guys,
Just a question RE setting up the DNS zone record correctly for a mail
server.
I have a couple of setups which work but have just copied one and I'm
getting the following response.
: Host or domain name not found. Name service
error for name=watercooledsurf.com type=A: Host foun
