Re: Workaround for brain-dead BATV

2011-08-08 Thread lst_hoe02
Zitat von Noel Jones : On 8/4/2011 3:32 AM, lst_ho...@kwsoft.de wrote: Hello we got problems with customers requesting MDN according to RFC-3798 with Disposition-Notification-To: header and using BATV on their gateways. On our side we honor read-request and sent MDNs with empty envelope sender

Re: Workaround for brain-dead BATV

2011-08-04 Thread Noel Jones
On 8/4/2011 3:32 AM, lst_ho...@kwsoft.de wrote: > Hello > > we got problems with customers requesting MDN according to RFC-3798 > with Disposition-Notification-To: header and using BATV on their > gateways. On our side we honor read-request and sent MDNs with empty > envelope sender to their Dispo

Re: Workaround for brain-dead BATV

2011-08-04 Thread Ralf Hildebrandt
* lst_ho...@kwsoft.de : > Hello > > we got problems with customers requesting MDN according to RFC-3798 > with Disposition-Notification-To: header and using BATV on their > gateways. On our side we honor read-request and sent MDNs with empty > envelope sender to their Disposition-Notification-To:

Workaround for brain-dead BATV

2011-08-04 Thread lst_hoe02
Hello we got problems with customers requesting MDN according to RFC-3798 with Disposition-Notification-To: header and using BATV on their gateways. On our side we honor read-request and sent MDNs with empty envelope sender to their Disposition-Notification-To: header which is unfortunate