On Sat, 20 Jul 2024 at 06:28, timothy via Postfix-users <
postfix-users@postfix.org> wrote:
>
> When I open webmail, it always displays a dropdown menu for me to select
> an IMAP host.This is so frustrating.How to disable this drop-down menu and
> automatically match email addre
On 20/07/2024 14:27, timothy via Postfix-users wrote:
Hello,
I know this is not a general postfix issue, but since it is related to email, I
am posting it here.
I use the latest version of roundcube as my webmail, and I want to allow
webmail access to free.fr and gmx.it (I have accounts with
Hello,
I know this is not a general postfix issue, but since it is related to email, I
am posting it here.
I use the latest version of roundcube as my webmail, and I want to allow
webmail access to free.fr and gmx.it (I have accounts with these two email
providers).So set the following in rc&#
Hi,
I am using it now for some time, it's a fork of Rainloop (previously used).
It works quite well with no issues so far.
Kind regards
Op wo 4 mei 2022 om 13:17 schreef wilson :
> has anyone been using this wm client?
> https://snappymail.eu/
>
> can you share your user experience on it?
>
> th
has anyone been using this wm client?
https://snappymail.eu/
can you share your user experience on it?
thank you.
* Frank Hwa:
> I like postfix and dovecot for setting up mail systems. But I don't
> like roundcube or rainloop webmail.
You might give SOGo (https://www.sogo.nu) a shot.
-Ralph
On 2022-01-18 12:58, Frank Hwa wrote:
I like postfix and dovecot for setting up mail systems.
But I don't like roundcube or rainloop webmail.
How can I make a webmail system like gmail? it would have gmail's
primary features such as grouping, filtering, labeling. is there any
open
Hello
I like postfix and dovecot for setting up mail systems.
But I don't like roundcube or rainloop webmail.
How can I make a webmail system like gmail? it would have gmail's
primary features such as grouping, filtering, labeling. is there any
opensource one?
Thank you.
Frank
Subject: Planning on setting up Postfix + Dovecot + Webmail + Apache +
MariaDB + PHP using Webmin Control Panel in the Cloud
Good day from the Republic of Singapore,
I am planning to setup Postfix Email Server + Dovecot IMAP/POP3
Incoming Mail Server + Webmail (Roundcube or Squirrelmail
On 7/12/2015 9:23 PM, Luis Daniel Lucio Quiroz wrote:
Your problem is not the webmail, and it has nothing to do with
postfix. But answering your question, try roundcube
On Jul 12, 2015 10:20 PM, "Al Zick" <mailto:a...@familysafeinternet.com>> wrote:
Hi,
Your problem is not the webmail, and it has nothing to do with postfix. But
answering your question, try roundcube
On Jul 12, 2015 10:20 PM, "Al Zick" wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I really hope that someone can help me on this list. I spent hours
> googling and hours installing webmail
Hi,
I really hope that someone can help me on this list. I spent hours
googling and hours installing webmail clients. Still, I was not able
to find one that I like. The only one that I could get working was
squirrel mail. They all seem to have too long of a list of
dependencies, but I
On Tue, Apr 01, 2014 at 02:32:07PM +0200, Pau Peris wrote:
> Come on, let's make some sense.
What makes sense to me is to terminate your membership on this
list, which I've done. If at some point you decide to stop posting
public tantrums, you can come back, but if so, you must promise to
keep y
>This is the most fun think I've read in a very long while!
I agree.
Pau, if you want to mail me off-list and discuss your postfix issue (in
spanish), feel free to do it.
But if you read this thread carefully, you'll realize that these folks have
explained to you that postfix can reject sende
Wietse, exception? Don't fool man. Everyone here knows there is no
exception on being at the "friend" side while trying to kick the new kid.
Come on, let's make some sense. At your age you should know no one is going
to belief this is an ...
Wietse, just one more thing. Don't you think at your age
On 01/04/2014 12:41, Pau Peris wrote:
> Not meant to offend, but Viktor, i'm still waiting for you knowledge to
> come around. And no, i'm not even asking you for a solution which
> obviously you don't know, but at least to come here and ask for excuses
> for you unfortunate behavior.
This is the
Pau Peris:
> Not meant to offend, but Viktor, i'm still waiting for you knowledge to
> come around. And no, i'm not even asking you for a solution which obviously
> you don't know, but at least to come here and ask for excuses for you
> unfortunate behavior.
>
> Probably, 20 hours is enough time
great explanation, but i
think that's
> > >> >> > not what i'm looking for.
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> > What i'm trying to accomplish is to make sure the from address
used in the
> > >> >> >
accomplish is to make sure the from address
used in the
> >> >> > envelope is the same address used to login. I don't mind if they
use a
> >> >> > different reply to address or something similar.
> >> >>
> >> >> Well, your previou
ticated_sender_login_mismatch would do the trick but there's a
>> > case where login address is the same as the sender address - at least
>> > that's what it looks like after checking the mail.log - but once i get the
>> > email at Google Apps i notice the From hea
, i'm still wondering - and i do not know if anyone here is able
to answer - why Mozilla Thunderbird or Roundcube get rejected when Editing
the From address - at least it looks to me the From address and not the
envelope sender - but doing through AfterLogic Webmail the Postfix mail.log
show a
the mail.log - but once i get the
> email at Google Apps i notice the From header belongs to the forged address
> edited through the Identity edit form which AfterLogic Webmail provides.
There you go again, talking about the header From. MAKE UP YOUR MIND!
> What i would like is to reject
mail.log - but once i get the
email at Google Apps i notice the From header belongs to the forged address
edited through the Identity edit form which AfterLogic Webmail provides.
Same Identity forms exists in different webmail solutions or email desktop
clients like Roundcube or Mozilla Thunde
On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 04:32:45PM +0200, Pau Peris wrote:
> I'm running Postfix 2.11 and I would like to reject/prevent authenticated
> users from sending emails with forged sender/from address.
Postfix only restricts forgery of the envelope sender address.
There are no features in Postfix to re
in_maps.cf
smtpd_sender_restrictions =
...
reject_unlisted_sender,
reject_authenticated_sender_login_mismatch,
...
This generates the following output when an authenticated user tries to
spoof its sending email address
https://gist.github.com/sibok/efb72be811a51691913a.
But don't know why when using Aft
On tor 16 dec 2010 12:06:18 CET, deconya wrote
Im using Postfix + Dovecot + openldap + rouncube. If you need more
info please comment me.
grep 127.0.0.1 /var/log/maillog | grep 143 | sort -u | wc -l | mrtg.sh
:-)
maybe not perfect, but inspiration is free
--
xpoint
about use of webmail, exactly
which users used webmail during a week. Any of yours know how to make
it?
Im using Postfix + Dovecot + openldap + rouncube. If you need more
info please comment me.
Thanks!!
You'll need to check the roundcube and apache logs to see who is using
the webmail s
On 12/16/2010 5:06 AM, deconya wrote:
Hi guys
My boss said me to know the statistics about use of webmail, exactly
which users used webmail during a week. Any of yours know how to make
it?
Im using Postfix + Dovecot + openldap + rouncube. If you need more
info please comment me.
Thanks
Hi guys
My boss said me to know the statistics about use of webmail, exactly
which users used webmail during a week. Any of yours know how to make
it?
Im using Postfix + Dovecot + openldap + rouncube. If you need more
info please comment me.
Thanks!!
LuKreme put forth on 2/12/2010 10:08 AM:
> On 12-Feb-2010, at 08:48, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
>>
>> Tell me about this "top-secure" aspect of Squirrelmail again. ;)
>
> The fact that some spammers are able to get into email accounts and send spam
> via squirrelmail has nothing to do with the security
On 02/12/2010 10:48 AM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> Tell me about this "top-secure" aspect of Squirrelmail again. ;)
> User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.15
Spammers regularly phish for ISP account information and then use those
credentials to send spam via webmail and SMTP auth. We see
On 12-Feb-2010, at 08:48, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
>
> Tell me about this "top-secure" aspect of Squirrelmail again. ;)
The fact that some spammers are able to get into email accounts and send spam
via squirrelmail has nothing to do with the security of squirrelmail itself. In
nerely all, if not al
Thijssen put forth on 2/9/2010 4:19 AM:
> - If they like flashy GUI bullshit like HTML-mail and WYSIWYG
> formatted emails and spam and commerce, then don't use Squirrelmail.
> - If they focuss on actual text content and plaintext emails (the way
> it should be), then squirrelmail is your Number O
ates, the question is, sometimes: the response
time to get the issues solved. The thing is: I'm currently avoiding
roundcube, for the same reason why I used to avoid bind: bad security
history. It looks like a really promising project, and if they "keep
up the good work", they will become a really, really good webmail
system, and not just "nice", but also secure.
On 8-Feb-2010, at 17:34, Jose Ildefonso Camargo Tolosa wrote:
>
> 100% of the servers I have access to, have,
> at least once in the last year, been scanned by a bot (or person, who
> knows) for /roundcoube or similar
And? I have thousands of servers trying to access my machines via sshd every
s
probably find Squirrelmail rather
>>> limited by comparison.
>>
>> ... it depends, if you use squirrelmail, you will be able to read
>> your mail using any phone using operamini, that's a neat feature.
>
> Yes, and that's an important consideration wh
at feature.
Yes, and that's an important consideration when choosing a webmail
client. It's very difficult to make a webmail cient work equally well as
a mobile client and as a replacement for a desktop client.
80 would be a very low figure for the type of use I'm thinking
ser who gets a much larger than normal volume
>>> of mail,
>>
>> What do you mean by that?
>
> Hundreds, or even thousands, of messages a day.
So?? please read on.
>
>>> it's too lacking in functionality. That's what more full-featured
>
messages a day.
it's too lacking in functionality. That's what more full-featured
webmail clients, such as Horde and Roundcube, are trying to
address, albeit at the cost of additional complexity from a
sysadmin perspective.
Plus at the cost of speed and responsiveness for the majority of
On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 12:28, Mark Goodge wrote:
> As a lightweight webmail client, to be used as an infrequent alternative to
> a desktop client (eg, for collecting your mail when out and about with only
> web access), Squirrelmail is perfectly adequate for most users.
I use it
utorespond etc..i'll give a try to squirrelmail
>
> XS4ALL, the largest Dutch ISP, uses Squirrelmail code for their
webmail
> (https://webmail.xs4all.nl/). You can access and use the existing
Quota
> and Autorespond systems that are out there using squirrelmail.
However, their new (
On 09/02/2010 10:19, Thijssen wrote:
On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 16:52, K bharathan wrote:
of course this is a non postfix topic; but i'd like to know from the
experienced which webmail is best for a postfix pop server
It mostly depends on the type of users you have;
- If they like flash
L, the largest Dutch ISP, uses Squirrelmail code for their
webmail (https://webmail.xs4all.nl/).
You can access and use the existing Quota and Autorespond systems that
are out there using squirrelmail.
b 1, 2010 at 16:52, K bharathan wrote:
> > of course this is a non postfix topic; but i'd like to know from the
> > experienced which webmail is best for a postfix pop server
>
> It mostly depends on the type of users you have;
>
> - If they like flashy GUI bullshit li
On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 16:52, K bharathan wrote:
> of course this is a non postfix topic; but i'd like to know from the
> experienced which webmail is best for a postfix pop server
It mostly depends on the type of users you have;
- If they like flashy GUI bullshit like HTML-mail
ndcube (and other)
> packages up to date. For instance, I do security updates on my Debian servers
> once a week. My Roundcube package is currently up to date, and it is a
> standard
> Debian package:
I use Debian too.
>> That said, it's not the only webmail client (or any
K bharathan put forth on 2/2/2010 10:49 AM:
> thanks for all
>
> On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 6:05 PM, Carlos Williams wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 8:36 AM, Charles Marcus
>> wrote:
>>> On 2010-02-01 7:17 PM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
All of that said, I don't find I'm lacking any functionality
thanks for all
On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 6:05 PM, Carlos Williams wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 8:36 AM, Charles Marcus
> wrote:
> > On 2010-02-01 7:17 PM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> >> All of that said, I don't find I'm lacking any functionality with my
> current
> >> version of Roundcube.
> >
> > T
On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 8:36 AM, Charles Marcus
wrote:
> On 2010-02-01 7:17 PM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
>> All of that said, I don't find I'm lacking any functionality with my current
>> version of Roundcube.
>
> Then you haven't looked at it... the new features are really nice...
I would say this is
On 2010-02-01 7:17 PM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> All of that said, I don't find I'm lacking any functionality with my current
> version of Roundcube.
Then you haven't looked at it... the new features are really nice...
> > http://roundcube.net/
>
> +1
>
> If you're going to offer webmail, you may as well offer IMAP folders instead
> of
> POP. JMHO.
>
I think it depends upon the requirements. For very simple mail and setup, +1
roundcube. I have been using horde for some
Ralf Hildebrandt put forth on 2/1/2010 4:31 PM:
> That's probably some sort of twisted Debian humor .)
I wish it was humor... Debian Stable always lags pretty seriously behind the
cutting edge release versions of a lot of packages. Then again, from what I
understand, so do RHEL, CentOS, SLES, a
Charles Marcus put forth on 2/1/2010 4:17 PM:
> On 2010-02-01 4:05 PM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
>> My Roundcube package is currently up to date, and it is a standard
>> Debian package:
>>
>> [02:21:52][r...@greer]/$ aptitude show roundcube
>> Package: roundcube
>> New: yes
>> State: installed
>> Automa
On 1-Feb-2010, at 13:39, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
>
> Carlos Williams put forth on 2/1/2010 10:04 AM:
>
>> I recommend and prefer Roundcube.
>>
>> http://roundcube.net/
>
> +1
>
> If you're going to offer webmail, you may as well offer IMAP folders inst
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
mouss さんは書きました:
>
> you mean things like
> GET /roundcube-0.2//bin/msgimport
> GET /round//bin/msgimport
Not lately.
Most recently, they're looking for version info:
GET /rc/README
GET /webmail/README
GET
* fakessh :
> > Eh? 0.3.1 is the current version, so how is 0.2.2 'up to date'?
>
> attention
>
> 0.3.1 is the current version , so 0.2.2 is 'up to date'
That's probably some sort of twisted Debian humor .)
On Mon, 01 Feb 2010 17:17:49 -0500, Charles Marcus
wrote:
> On 2010-02-01 4:05 PM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
>> My Roundcube package is currently up to date, and it is a standard
>> Debian package:
>>
>> [02:21:52][r...@greer]/$ aptitude show roundcube
>> Package: roundcube
>> New: yes
>> State: insta
On 2010-02-01 4:05 PM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> My Roundcube package is currently up to date, and it is a standard
> Debian package:
>
> [02:21:52][r...@greer]/$ aptitude show roundcube
> Package: roundcube
> New: yes
> State: installed
> Automatically installed: no
> Version: 0.2.2-1~bpo50+1
Eh? 0
K bharathan wrote:
hi all
of course this is a non postfix topic; but i'd like to know from the
experienced which webmail is best for a postfix pop server
i'd also have it configured for user soft quota
guidance appreciated
I would add from my side... Horde IMP. If you need good repla
.@greer]/$ aptitude show roundcube
Package: roundcube
New: yes
State: installed
Automatically installed: no
Version: 0.2.2-1~bpo50+1
Priority: extra
Section: web
Maintainer: Debian Roundcube Maintainers
Uncompressed Size: 94.2k
Depends: roundcube-core (= 0.2.2-1~bpo50+1)
Description: skinnable AJ
Carlos Williams put forth on 2/1/2010 10:04 AM:
> I recommend and prefer Roundcube.
>
> http://roundcube.net/
+1
If you're going to offer webmail, you may as well offer IMAP folders instead of
POP. JMHO.
I'm an ex Squirrelmail user and switched to Roundcube, mainly
es ( well for a webmail app is not an organizer thats
sure ) , and a very pleasant interface . I used squirrelmail before it
it worked very well though my user did complain about its ugly
interface. I also considered Horde but to be honest its seems to me an
overkill as a webmail client while round
GET /round//bin/msgimport
> ..
>
> they're looking for old versions.. See
> http://asert.arbornetworks.com/2009/01/roundcube-webmail-scanning/
> http://stateofsecurity.com/?p=550
>
>
> Funnily enough, they don't try SSL. (note that enforcing SSL for
> probably see orders of magnitude more if it weren't for fail2ban. I
> wonder what it is that makes it so popular?
>
you mean things like
GET /roundcube-0.2//bin/msgimport
GET /round//bin/msgimport
..
they're looking for old versions.. See
http://asert
it's kept up to date automatically,
while customers install their own roundcube and then don't maintain
it. That said, it's not the only webmail client (or any other web
app) that gets the install&neglect treatment, it's just the one most
frequently exploited.
S
o date automatically,
while customers install their own roundcube and then don't maintain it.
That said, it's not the only webmail client (or any other web app)
that gets the install&neglect treatment, it's just the one most
frequently exploited.
So if you want to run it,
it seems that roundcube is popular.
It seems to be most popular among bots as well, according to what my
apache logs say. I don't have roundcube but there are frequent
attempts to get to php scripts down in the roundcube directories. I'd
probably see orders of magnitude more if it weren't for fail
Luis Daniel Lucio Quiroz wrote:
Le Lundi 1 Février 2010 10:04:20, Carlos Williams a écrit :
On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 10:52 AM, K bharathan wrote:
hi all
of course this is a non postfix topic; but i'd like to know from the
experienced which webmail is best for a postfix pop serve
Le Lundi 1 Février 2010 10:04:20, Carlos Williams a écrit :
> On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 10:52 AM, K bharathan wrote:
> > hi all
> > of course this is a non postfix topic; but i'd like to know from the
> > experienced which webmail is best for a postfix pop server
> >
On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 10:52 AM, K bharathan wrote:
> hi all
> of course this is a non postfix topic; but i'd like to know from the
> experienced which webmail is best for a postfix pop server
> i'd also have it configured for user soft quota
> guidance appreciated
Po
hi all
of course this is a non postfix topic; but i'd like to know from the
experienced which webmail is best for a postfix pop server
i'd also have it configured for user soft quota
guidance appreciated
thanks
> you take a close look at its security history in light of these recent
> attacks, and see if there has been an adequate response. As with all
> applications, especially public facing ones, be sure to keep abreast of
> all security updates.
Not sure if you are also seeing many attacks aimed at IM
Carlos Williams wrote, at 05/19/2009 02:04 PM:
> On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 1:50 PM, Just E. Mail
> wrote:
>> Thank you all.
>>
>> I am going with roundcube: http://www.roundcube.net
>
> It's really eacy to install. Main thing is making sure you have PHP
> 5.2+ installed on Apache and also configu
On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 1:50 PM, Just E. Mail wrote:
> Thank you all.
>
> I am going with roundcube: http://www.roundcube.net
It's really eacy to install. Main thing is making sure you have PHP
5.2+ installed on Apache and also configuring your MySQL database
which is super easy if you follow th
Thank you all.
I am going with roundcube: http://www.roundcube.net
Carlos Williams wrote:
> On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 11:25 AM, Just E. Mail
> wrote:
>
>> I am posting this message here because I want Postfix uses to suggest a
>> webmail application best suited with Postfix. This question has been asked
>> and answered several times
On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 11:25 AM, Just E. Mail wrote:
> I am posting this message here because I want Postfix uses to suggest a
> webmail application best suited with Postfix. This question has been asked
> and answered several times but since LINUX is changing so fast, I am askin
Just E. Mail wrote:
> I am posting this message here because I want Postfix uses to suggest a
> webmail application best suited with Postfix. This question has been
> asked and answered several times but since LINUX is changing so fast, I
> am asking again.
>
> System: Cent
I am posting this message here because I want Postfix uses to suggest a
webmail application best suited with Postfix. This question has been
asked and answered several times but since LINUX is changing so fast, I
am asking again.
System: CentOS 5.3, NSF-1.3.23, PostgreSQL-8.3.7, Postfix-2.3.3
ge 1.80).
>
> The only way I could get it working was by using the following command
> in main.cf
> smtpd_end_of_data_restrictions = check_policy_service
> inet:127.0.0.1:10031
>
> Definitely looks good, however, once configured, it blocks 127.0.0.1 :(
> Which of co
While trying to get this to work, I installed the squirrelmail plugin
called Restrict Senders.
http://www.squirrelmail.org/plugin_view.php?id=213
This is stopping the spammers using webmail.
Regards,
Ross
From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org
[mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org] On Behalf
s by using the following command
in main.cf
smtpd_end_of_data_restrictions = check_policy_service
inet:127.0.0.1:10031
Definitely looks good, however, once configured, it blocks 127.0.0.1 :(
Which of course is correct as that is the IP sending via webmail !
I've missed something here.
Could you
ably to protect the identity of their user.
This is not an issue on your side.
However, if your webmail is getting abused frequently you should deploy
some mechanism to monitor mail volume per account and (temporarily?)
block them or have a closer look if they send too much. That can be
archived w
On Fri, 27 Mar 2009 09:44:21 +1100
"Ross Tsolakidis" wrote:
> Just change the users password and slap them for clicking on the link.
> Easy.
Easy but tedious.
I had to resort to installing postfix-policyd to rate limit them.
(Make sure you have Squirrel use auth so regardless of forged-from
li
Hi all,
I'm sure many of you are battling this issue.
Our mailserver is being blacklisted so often it's getting painful.
I don't believe this is a postfix issue, but most of the brilliant mail
server admins are here :)
I'm pretty sure the following is happening, here's the news from the
squirrel
85 matches
Mail list logo
