> > So you leave your online documentation using the syntax of a
> > release that is 6 years old? That seems fairly odd. Why not use
> > versioned documentation?
People can legitimately use Postfix over a span of many years.
Currently, the oldest supported release is Postfix version 2.4,
which
On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 15:30, /dev/rob0 wrote:
> Another drawback to having versioned documentation online is that El
> Goog is as likely to find the wrong version of a document. If a
> seeker ends up at http://www.postfix.org/documentation.html , all's
> well, but not necessarily so if they fin
On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 09:39:05AM -0700, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
> --On Wednesday, June 23, 2010 5:28 PM -0400 Victor Duchovni
> wrote:
>
>> http://www.postfix.org/ldap_table.5.html
>>
>> BACKWARDS COMPATIBILITY
>>For backwards compatibility with Postfix version 2.0 and
>
> So
