Wietse,
thank you for your response.
On 03/08/2017 10:44 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
Robert Moskowitz:
But this is not the point. In fact, if there is no guidance on how to
use postconf for managing master.cf, it really does not matter which
version of postfix I use. Just maintain master.cf as
Viktor,
thanks for your reply. More below.
On 03/08/2017 10:34 AM, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
On Mar 8, 2017, at 8:16 AM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
But this is not the point. In fact, if there is no guidance on how to
use postconf for managing master.cf, it really does not matter which
version of
Robert Moskowitz:
> But this is not the point. In fact, if there is no guidance on how to
> use postconf for managing master.cf, it really does not matter which
> version of postfix I use. Just maintain master.cf as we always have.
>
> There is a nice http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html wri
> On Mar 8, 2017, at 8:16 AM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
>
> But this is not the point. In fact, if there is no guidance on how to
> use postconf for managing master.cf, it really does not matter which
> version of postfix I use. Just maintain master.cf as we always have.
All the postconf(1) com
27;, but I see that the -P option
came out in postfix 2.11
Is there guidance to using postconf to manage master.cf?
thank you
According to the documentation located on
ftp://ftp.porcupine.org/mirrors/postfix-release/index.html
the 2.10.1 version is no longer supported. I know nothing about
Centos
#x27;, but I see that the -P option
>came out in postfix 2.11
>
>Is there guidance to using postconf to manage master.cf?
>
>thank you
According to the documentation located on
ftp://ftp.porcupine.org/mirrors/postfix-release/index.html
the 2.10.1 version is no longer supported. I
cannot
find any guidance on using this. My search foo is notoriously weak; my
searching this list has not found any discussion on this since 1/13.
I found one blog that uses 'postconf -P', but I see that the -P option
came out in postfix 2.11
Is there guidance to using postconf
