Lluis Ribes wrote:
Why?
because:
- mail loss is bad. The RFC recommends against it (search the RFC for
"frivoulously"). ask those of us who keep criticizing hotmail for such
behaviour.
- with a reject at RCPT time, you don't lose your bandwidth and time
reading the message (the connectio
OK!
I'm going to configure REJECT,
Thanks a lot
Lluís
-Mensaje original-
De: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] En nombre de Charles Marcus
Enviado el: martes, 04 de noviembre de 2008 15:47
Para: postfix-users@postfix.org
Asunto: Re: Use discard in a check_recipient_acces
On 11/4/2008, Lluis Ribes ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> If I want to avoid that the spammer wouldn't receive a response like this:
>
> "but it was rejected by the recipient domain. We recommend contacting
> the other email provider for further information about the cause of
> this error. The error
554 5.7.1 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Recipient address rejected: Access denied (state 14).
Thanks again!
Lluís
-Mensaje original-
De: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] En nombre de mouss
Enviado el: martes, 04 de noviembre de 2008 14:15
Para: postfix-users@postfix.org
Asunto: Re:
Lluis Ribes wrote:
Hi,
Could I use the “DISCARD” word in a check_recipient_access hash: rule? By
example:
%more /etc/postfix/access
[EMAIL PROTECTED] permit_mynetworks,DISCARD
or should I use use REJECT word. I don’t want to send error reply if someone
sends mail to [EMAIL PROTECT
Hi,
Could I use the DISCARD word in a check_recipient_access hash: rule? By
example:
%more /etc/postfix/access
[EMAIL PROTECTED] permit_mynetworks,DISCARD
or should I use use REJECT word. I dont want to send error reply if someone
sends mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] from out of my netwo
