On Sat, 2012-06-30 at 22:53 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
> Am 30.06.2012 22:41, schrieb Andrew Beverley:
> >>> html_directory = /usr/share/doc/postfix-2.3.3/html
> >>
> >> Hmmm, 2.3.3 is very old, and did not have support for this:
> >
> > Well spotted. I should have said: this is Postfix 2.7.1. Th
Am 30.06.2012 22:41, schrieb Andrew Beverley:
>>> html_directory = /usr/share/doc/postfix-2.3.3/html
>>
>> Hmmm, 2.3.3 is very old, and did not have support for this:
>
> Well spotted. I should have said: this is Postfix 2.7.1. That's a
> hangover from the original installation.
make a bugrepor
On Mon, 2012-06-04 at 15:47 -0500, /dev/rob0 wrote:
> > I've come across instances when mail is still delivered to a
> > command using the user "nobody" (such as when a mail is generated
> > from the local server rather than delivered from an external
> > source).
>
> You forgot to include logs
On Mon, Jun 04, 2012 at 10:38:02AM +0100, Andrew Beverley wrote:
> I've been using the default_privs setting to control which user
> Postfix uses to deliver mail to external commands. However, I note
> from the manual that this setting is only used "from an aliases
> file that is owned by root,
I've been using the default_privs setting to control which user Postfix
uses to deliver mail to external commands. However, I note from the
manual that this setting is only used "from an aliases file that is
owned by root, or when delivery is done on behalf of root".
I've come across instances whe
