On 2/24/2012 4:29 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
>> > That is the part I didn't understand. What exactly triggers the other
>> > rejections I see with NOQUEUE? I thought each message would be rejected
> What other rejections? You have shown nothing.
Yes, for I have failed to post all that I have referen
On 2012-02-24 4:33 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
That is explained in my two sentences above. I am not a pervert
who has a better explanation but refuses to share it.
Maybe not, but you definitely have one of the driest senses of humor
I've ever seen... thanks for making me spill my tea all over m
Robert Fitzpatrick:
> But unlike other domains that we transport for, I do not see the NOQUEUE
> reject log entries for this user address, I do see the deliveries for
> >>>
> >>> If you don't save the probe result, then the result is thrown away.
> >>> Telepathic computing is not yet comm
Robert Fitzpatrick:
> On 2/24/2012 4:17 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> > There is also is some logic to prevent a negative probe result from
> > replacing a positive result. This is needed because Postfix will
> > try to refresh a probe result before it expires.
>
> Just read this after my last post.
On 2/24/2012 4:17 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> There is also is some logic to prevent a negative probe result from
> replacing a positive result. This is needed because Postfix will
> try to refresh a probe result before it expires.
Just read this after my last post. Perhaps this explains, the addre
On 2/24/2012 3:40 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Robert Fitzpatrick:
>> On 2/24/2012 2:44 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
>>> Robert Fitzpatrick:
(maybe more) domain. I see the following message for this unknown user
where AV seems to be working, I only cache positives
>>> ...
Feb 24 08:33:
Wietse Venema:
> Robert Fitzpatrick:
> > On 2/24/2012 2:44 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> > > Robert Fitzpatrick:
> > >> (maybe more) domain. I see the following message for this unknown user
> > >> where AV seems to be working, I only cache positives
> > > ...
> > >> Feb 24 08:33:55 mx1 postfix/sm
Robert Fitzpatrick:
> On 2/24/2012 2:44 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> > Robert Fitzpatrick:
> >> (maybe more) domain. I see the following message for this unknown user
> >> where AV seems to be working, I only cache positives
> > ...
> >> Feb 24 08:33:55 mx1 postfix/smtp[6812]: 8024C2E2BD:
> >> to
Robert Fitzpatrick:
> (maybe more) domain. I see the following message for this unknown user
> where AV seems to be working, I only cache positives
...
> Feb 24 08:33:55 mx1 postfix/smtp[6812]: 8024C2E2BD:
> to=, relay=x.x.x.x[x.x.x.x]:25, delay=10,
> delays=0.01/0.01/5.1/5, dsn=5.1.1, status=u
Having a problem understanding where my issue is with AV for this one
(maybe more) domain. I see the following message for this unknown user
where AV seems to be working, I only cache positives
mx1# grep 8024C2E2BD /var/log/maillog
Feb 24 08:33:45 mx1 postfix/cleanup[7752]: 8024C2E2BD:
message
10 matches
Mail list logo
