Thanks!
That was exactly the documentation I was looking for!
Jens
On Tue, Oct 11, 2022 at 11:05 AM Sven Schwedas wrote:
>
> On 11.10.22 10:37, Jens Hoffrichter wrote:
> > What are the technical differences between those two methods of connecting?
>
> http://www.postfix.org/FORWARD_SECRECY_READ
On 11.10.22 10:37, Jens Hoffrichter wrote:
What are the technical differences between those two methods of connecting?
http://www.postfix.org/FORWARD_SECRECY_README.html Last section. Your
settings influence how it determines the difference between the two
security levels.
OpenPGP_signature
Hi,
We are running a fairly large postfix installation, with a lot of TLS
policy entries and our own curated trust store.
For some TLS connections, I see in the log
Trusted TLS connection established
and for some, I see
Verified TLS connection established
Both to the same type of remote serve
On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 01:13:22PM +0100, A. Schulze wrote:
> while checking TLS to a destination domain I noticed a difference.
> posttls-finger say "Verified" but log say (only) "Trusted".
The posttls-finger(1) utility defaults to the "dane" security level
when TLSA records are present and "sec
Hello,
while checking TLS to a destination domain I noticed a difference.
posttls-finger say "Verified" but log say (only) "Trusted".
# posttls-finger -c -F /etc/ssl/mail/trusted_cas.pem avira.com
posttls-finger: mx1.c01.avira.com[212.79.247.134]:25: subjectAltName:
mx.ames.avira.net
postt
