mouss:
> Noel Jones a ?crit :
> > Thomas wrote:
> >> Thomas Ackermann wrote:
> >>> So, does anybody know what technically is the difference between the
> >>> use with and without the signs?
> >>> I mean, what network things may happen or not happen?
> >>
> >> Nobody knows the technical differences?
Noel Jones a écrit :
> Thomas wrote:
>> Thomas Ackermann wrote:
>>> So, does anybody know what technically is the difference between the
>>> use with and without the signs?
>>> I mean, what network things may happen or not happen?
>>
>> Nobody knows the technical differences?
>>
>> :-(
>
> ... mor
Thomas:
> Duane Hill wrote:
> > Care to take a look at the Postfix documentation?
> >
> > http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#relayhost
>
>
> As i wrote, i read the documentation i found - it was exactly this small
> entry about relayhost!
>
> The answer from Noel Jones contains quite some m
Noel Jones wrote:
... more likely nobody cares, because postfix behavior is documented.
When the relayhost is a hostname enclosed by "[ ]" brackets, postfix
asks for an A record and does not ask for an MX record.
If relayhost is an IP address enclosed by brackets, postfix uses that
IP with n
Duane Hill wrote:
Care to take a look at the Postfix documentation?
http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#relayhost
As i wrote, i read the documentation i found - it was exactly this small
entry about relayhost!
The answer from Noel Jones contains quite some more and deeper
information -
On Sat, 24 Jan 2009, Thomas wrote:
Thomas Ackermann wrote:
So, does anybody know what technically is the difference between the use
with and without the signs?
I mean, what network things may happen or not happen?
Nobody knows the technical differences?
Care to take a look at the Postfix d
Thomas wrote:
Thomas Ackermann wrote:
So, does anybody know what technically is the difference between the
use with and without the signs?
I mean, what network things may happen or not happen?
Nobody knows the technical differences?
:-(
... more likely nobody cares, because postfix behavio
Thomas Ackermann wrote:
So, does anybody know what technically is the difference between the
use with and without the signs?
I mean, what network things may happen or not happen?
Nobody knows the technical differences?
:-(
Hello,
i read the documentation about the usage of "[" and "]" in relayhost
entries ...
I still not quite sure what happens or not happens when using an IP with
or without such signs...
relayhost = 1.2.3.4
may use MX records from DNS?
What if there is no nameserver configured? Will there be
