RE: Timing question

2009-02-13 Thread Rocco Scappatura
Sorry for the delay.. > > >> >> Could you explain - in the same terms - how is quantified the > time > > >> >> before > > >> >> a message is passed to the queue manager, after it is processed > by > > >> the > > >> >> content filter? > > >> > > > >> > The time to deliver is measured as the time be

Re: Timing question

2009-01-31 Thread Victor Duchovni
On Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 11:45:54PM +0100, Rocco Scappatura wrote: > Wietse, > > >> >> Could you explain - in the same terms - how is quantified the time > >> >> before > >> >> a message is passed to the queue manager, after it is processed by > >> the > >> >> content filter? > >> > > >> > The tim

Re: Timing question

2009-01-31 Thread Rocco Scappatura
Wietse, >> >> Could you explain - in the same terms - how is quantified the time >> >> before >> >> a message is passed to the queue manager, after it is processed by >> the >> >> content filter? >> > >> > The time to deliver is measured as the time between MAIL FROM and >> > "end-of-data". >> >>

Re: Timing question

2009-01-31 Thread Wietse Venema
Rocco Scappatura: > >> So.. raising "maxprocs" value for the contet filter could not reduce > >> delay > >> "d" in 1) anyway.. Right? To raise "maxprocs" value for the contet > >> filter > >> helps only when is the active queue congested.. I think.. > > > > That depends on how much of that time the

Re: Timing question

2009-01-31 Thread Rocco Scappatura
>> >> >> For example consider the log relative to the relay entries (to the >> >> >> cntent >> >> >> filer and to postfix without conten filter): >> >> >> >> >> >> 1) Jan 30 10:02:17 av5 postfix/smtp[10603]: C0AFB226F23: >> >> >> to=, relay=127.0.0.1[127.0.0.1]:10026, >> >> delay=8.9, >> >> >> dela

Re: Timing question

2009-01-31 Thread Wietse Venema
Rocco Scappatura: > Thanks Wietse and Victor, > > >> >> For example consider the log relative to the relay entries (to the > >> >> cntent > >> >> filer and to postfix without conten filter): > >> >> > >> >> 1) Jan 30 10:02:17 av5 postfix/smtp[10603]: C0AFB226F23: > >> >> to=, relay=127.0.0.1[127.0

Re: Timing question

2009-01-31 Thread Rocco Scappatura
Thanks Wietse and Victor, >> >> For example consider the log relative to the relay entries (to the >> >> cntent >> >> filer and to postfix without conten filter): >> >> >> >> 1) Jan 30 10:02:17 av5 postfix/smtp[10603]: C0AFB226F23: >> >> to=, relay=127.0.0.1[127.0.0.1]:10026, >> delay=8.9, >> >

Re: Timing question

2009-01-30 Thread Victor Duchovni
On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 07:35:53PM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote: > > 1) Jan 30 10:02:17 av5 postfix/smtp[10603]: C0AFB226F23: > > to=, relay=127.0.0.1[127.0.0.1]:10026, delay=8.9, > > delays=1.3/0/0/7.7, dsn=2.0.0, status=sent (250 2.0.0 Ok: queued as > > 95CEE226F30) > > Postfix measures 7.7 secon

Re: Timing question

2009-01-30 Thread Wietse Venema
Rocco Scappatura: > Thanks Wietse, > > >> For example consider the log relative to the relay entries (to the > >> cntent > >> filer and to postfix without conten filter): > >> > >> 1) Jan 30 10:02:17 av5 postfix/smtp[10603]: C0AFB226F23: > >> to=, relay=127.0.0.1[127.0.0.1]:10026, delay=8.9, > >>

Re: Timing question

2009-01-30 Thread Rocco Scappatura
Thanks Wietse, >> For example consider the log relative to the relay entries (to the >> cntent >> filer and to postfix without conten filter): >> >> 1) Jan 30 10:02:17 av5 postfix/smtp[10603]: C0AFB226F23: >> to=, relay=127.0.0.1[127.0.0.1]:10026, delay=8.9, >> delays=1.3/0/0/7.7, dsn=2.0.0, statu

Re: Timing question

2009-01-30 Thread Wietse Venema
Rocco Scappatura: > For example consider the log relative to the relay entries (to the cntent > filer and to postfix without conten filter): > > 1) Jan 30 10:02:17 av5 postfix/smtp[10603]: C0AFB226F23: > to=, relay=127.0.0.1[127.0.0.1]:10026, delay=8.9, > delays=1.3/0/0/7.7, dsn=2.0.0, status=sent

Re: Timing question

2009-01-30 Thread Rocco Scappatura
> I have a Postfix+Amavisd-new+MySQL+ClamAV mail gateway system. > > I'm observing time spent by a messagge in (Amavisd-new) content_filter > of postfix (I trascure deliberately the time spent by a message to be > processed by postfix, because it is neglegible with respect to the > filter). > > I "

Timing question

2009-01-30 Thread Rocco Scappatura
Hello. I have a Postfix+Amavisd-new+MySQL+ClamAV mail gateway system. I'm observing time spent by a messagge in (Amavisd-new) content_filter of postfix (I trascure deliberately the time spent by a message to be processed by postfix, because it is neglegible with respect to the filter). I "grep"