Matthias Andree:
> 3 - is there a useful way to log warnings about unqualified domains when
> they are observed and qualified in mid-flight, so that people have
> something to watch for before flipping the switch? It seems there
> already is, check_{sender,recipient}_access + WARN action + regexp
Am 24.09.2014 um 16:29 schrieb Wietse Venema:
> The implementation will probably be a compatibility_level parameter
> that is 1 for installations that pre-date this feature, that is 2
> for new installations, and that is incremented by 1 for each
> compatibility break. People who don't care can se
On 26 Sep 2014, at 13:04 , John wrote:
> The idea of handing out email addresses that do not have a fully qualified
> domain in them seems to be rather dumb.
The issue, as I understand it, is in files like aliases or virtual where you
may have something like
user...@secondarydomin.tld userbar
On 24/09/2014 10:29 AM, wie...@porcupine.org (Wietse Venema) wrote:
Thanks for the first-hand input, both on- and off-list. The responses
show that there is a massive problem with what Rumsfeld called the
"unknown unknowns".
That is, except for those who have total control over their clients,
Thanks for the first-hand input, both on- and off-list. The responses
show that there is a massive problem with what Rumsfeld called the
"unknown unknowns".
That is, except for those who have total control over their clients,
people generally have no idea what legacy systems might be sending
inc
