Santiago Romero:
> > There is no requirement that pickup runs 100% of the time. I
> > don't know where you got this ill-conceived idea from.
> >
>
> Opps.
>
> After my very first postfix install (last year), on a new server with
> no email traffic, I did a "postfix start" and noticed that o
There is no requirement that pickup runs 100% of the time. I
don't know where you got this ill-conceived idea from.
Opps.
After my very first postfix install (last year), on a new server with
no email traffic, I did a "postfix start" and noticed that only
"master", "qmgr" and "pickup" ap
Santiago Romero:
>
> Hi.
>
> I have a strange problem monitoring the "pickup" process: we have a
> monitoring system that, sometimes, warns us with "pickup process not in
> memory" (master and qmgr seems to continue running). When we enter the
There is no requirement that pickup runs 100% o
Bastian Blank escribió:
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 09:00:14AM +0100, Santiago Romero wrote:
I have a strange problem monitoring the "pickup" process: we have a
monitoring system that, sometimes, warns us with "pickup process not in
memory"
What is the meaning of this message?
Th
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 09:00:14AM +0100, Santiago Romero wrote:
> I have a strange problem monitoring the "pickup" process: we have a
> monitoring system that, sometimes, warns us with "pickup process not in
> memory"
What is the meaning of this message?
> Does the "wake up" restart the proc
Hi.
I have a strange problem monitoring the "pickup" process: we have a
monitoring system that, sometimes, warns us with "pickup process not in
memory" (master and qmgr seems to continue running). When we enter the
machine, we notice that pickup is really in memory, but after that
alarm, eve
