On Tue, Jul 05, 2011 at 02:59:52PM -0700, David Pierce wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 05, 2011 at 02:52:07PM -0700, David Pierce wrote:
> >
> > > I have a postfix instance on an admin-type node set to relay mail to a
> > host
> > > named "relayhost", i.e., relayhost = relayhost. Now, relayhost is
> > act
On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 2:55 PM, Victor Duchovni <
victor.ducho...@morganstanley.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 05, 2011 at 02:52:07PM -0700, David Pierce wrote:
>
> > I have a postfix instance on an admin-type node set to relay mail to a
> host
> > named "relayhost", i.e., relayhost = relayhost. Now,
On Tue, Jul 05, 2011 at 05:55:30PM -0400, Victor Duchovni wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 05, 2011 at 02:52:07PM -0700, David Pierce wrote:
>
> > I have a postfix instance on an admin-type node set to relay mail to a host
> > named "relayhost", i.e., relayhost = relayhost. Now, relayhost is actually
> > an
On Tue, Jul 05, 2011 at 02:52:07PM -0700, David Pierce wrote:
> I have a postfix instance on an admin-type node set to relay mail to a host
> named "relayhost", i.e., relayhost = relayhost. Now, relayhost is actually
> an A record for the IP of the relayhost. Funny enough, I do believe this
> wo
I have a postfix instance on an admin-type node set to relay mail to a host
named "relayhost", i.e., relayhost = relayhost. Now, relayhost is actually
an A record for the IP of the relayhost. Funny enough, I do believe this
worked with 2.3.3 (latest version from CentOS repo). I say "funny" becau