* Viktor Dukhovni :
> In the interim you can use 554 5.2.2 ... which won't be misunderstood.
Yeah, I'll do that instead.
--
[*] sys4 AG
http://sys4.de, +49 (89) 30 90 46 64
Franziskanerstraße 15, 81669 München
Sitz der Gesellschaft: München, Amtsgericht München: HRB 199263
Vorstand: Patrick B
On Fri, May 03, 2013 at 02:25:15PM +0200, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> Section 4.5.3.1 of RFC 2821 (4.5.3.1.10 in RFC 5321) recommends to treat
> a 552 response after the RCPT TO command as if it was actually a 452
> response. This behaviour was intended for cases where the number of
> recipients ex
* Bastian Blank :
> On Fri, May 03, 2013 at 10:18:43AM +0200, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> > Tue Apr 30 20:05:04 2013 Info: Delivery start DCID 4678286 MID 15335505 to
> > RID [0]
> > Tue Apr 30 20:05:06 2013 Info: Delayed: DCID 4678286 MID 15335505 to RID 0
> > - 4.1.0 -
> > Unknown address error (
On Fri, May 03, 2013 at 10:18:43AM +0200, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> Tue Apr 30 20:05:04 2013 Info: Delivery start DCID 4678286 MID 15335505 to
> RID [0]
> Tue Apr 30 20:05:06 2013 Info: Delayed: DCID 4678286 MID 15335505 to RID 0 -
> 4.1.0 -
> Unknown address error ('552', ['5.2.2 : Recipient
>
On our Postfix gateway we're using a policy query to our backend
dovecot server to check if the mail would fit into the mailbox.
Recently I noticed that the hu-berlin.de Mailserver keeps retrying in
spite of a 522 error:
May 1 05:32:36 mail postfix/smtpd[5185]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from
ir2.cm
