On 18-6-2010 11:38, Birta Levente wrote:
In my opinion the best way is to block all mails if sender appear in
recipient addresses. (I think it's stupid to send mail to yourself, if
it's about not spam)
It is very common to send something to yourself. For example if you want
to work on a docu
Mark Goodge put forth on 6/18/2010 4:28 AM:
> 1. Just discard spam.
By this I hope you mean rejecting the message at SMTP time, not accept and
move to /dev/null.
Regarding the OP's original issue, im my experience, nearly all spam that has
a 'from' address matching the local 'to' address is bot
Le 18/06/2010 11:51, Reko Turja a écrit :
I'm not a great fan of quarantining, although it works fairly well
for webmail systems where the quarantine can be accessed through the
same interface as the inbox (eg, Gmail and Hotmail). It's less
helpful where mail is delivered to a POP3 or IMAP box
I'm not a great fan of quarantining, although it works fairly well
for webmail systems where the quarantine can be accessed through the
same interface as the inbox (eg, Gmail and Hotmail). It's less
helpful where mail is delivered to a POP3 or IMAP box as users have
to go to a separate interfac
Le 18/06/2010 11:42, Erik Logtenberg a écrit :
Michael Weissenbacher wrote:
Conclusion: the spam is passed! I could stop sending notifications but I
think my employer would not like it...
Short answer:
You should NEVER notify anyone about detected spam! This will
effectiv
Michael Weissenbacher wrote:
>> Conclusion: the spam is passed! I could stop sending notifications but I
>>> think my employer would not like it...
> Short answer:
> You should NEVER notify anyone about detected spam! This will
> effectively make yourself a spam source. It's even worse when you att
On 18/06/2010 11:36, Antoine Nguyen wrote:
Hi all,
I'm facing a stupid situation and I'm looking for advises. I'm using a
postfix relay to filter viruses and spams. All is working well except
with spam that use the same declared address for both sender and
recipient. What happened in this par
Le 18/06/2010 11:28, Mark Goodge a écrit :
On 18/06/2010 10:17, Antoine Nguyen wrote:
Le 18/06/2010 11:15, Michael Weissenbacher a écrit :
Conclusion: the spam is passed! I could stop sending notifications
but I
think my employer would not like it...
Short answer:
You should NEVER notify anyo
On 18/06/2010 10:17, Antoine Nguyen wrote:
Le 18/06/2010 11:15, Michael Weissenbacher a écrit :
Conclusion: the spam is passed! I could stop sending notifications but I
think my employer would not like it...
Short answer:
You should NEVER notify anyone about detected spam! This will
effectivel
Le 18/06/2010 11:15, Michael Weissenbacher a écrit :
Conclusion: the spam is passed! I could stop sending notifications but I
think my employer would not like it...
Short answer:
You should NEVER notify anyone about detected spam! This will
effectively make yourself a spam source.
> Conclusion: the spam is passed! I could stop sending notifications but I
> > think my employer would not like it...
Short answer:
You should NEVER notify anyone about detected spam! This will
effectively make yourself a spam source. It's even worse when you attach
the original message.
hth,
Mich
Hi all,
I'm facing a stupid situation and I'm looking for advises. I'm using a
postfix relay to filter viruses and spams. All is working well except
with spam that use the same declared address for both sender and
recipient. What happened in this particular situation is described as
follow:
12 matches
Mail list logo
